The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyzing Compositional Data with R
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbiome Datasets Are Compositional: And This Is Not Optional
Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Egozcue, J. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224 · Cited by 3,044
“The clr transformed values can be used as inputs for multivariate hypothesis testing using tools such as MANOVA, regression etc. (Van den Boogaart and Tolosana-Delgado, 2013) and for model building.”
MethodConsistent and correctable bias in metagenomic sequencing experiments
McLaren, M. R., Willis, A. D., & Callahan, B. J. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46923 · Cited by 429
Compositional analysis: a valid approach to analyze microbiome high-throughput sequencing data
Gloor, G. B., & Reid, G. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/cjm-2015-0821 · Cited by 373
It's all relative: analyzing microbiome data as compositions
Gloor, G. B., Wu, J. R., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Egozcue, J. J. (2016) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.003 · Cited by 323
A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data
Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A. D., Mukherjee, S., & David, L. A. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21887 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Boogaart, K. G., & Tolosana-Delgado, R.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W374884248
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing Compositional Data with R. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-36809-7
- The paper
- van den Boogaart, K. G., & Tolosana-Delgado, R. (2013). Analyzing Compositional Data with R. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36809-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
