Cited by 60Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsFlow Experience in Various Fields

“Towards an understanding of affect and knowledge from student interaction with an intelligent tutoring system,”

San Pedro, Maria Ofelia Z., Baker, Ryan S. J. d., Gowda, Sujith M., Heffernan, Neil T.·2013·Lecture notes in computer science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_5

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incorporating affect and behavioral state of the learner into the design of the tutoring system enhances the effectiveness of the teaching process.

    “Scientific research proposes incorporating affect and behavioral state of the learner into the design of the tutoring system as it enhances the effectiveness of the teaching process (Woolf et al., 2009; San Pedro et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
San Pedro, M. O. Z., Baker, R. S. J. D., Gowda, S. M., & Heffernan, N. T.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
Venue
Lecture notes in computer science
Published
2013
Pages
41-50
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W121401296
Cited by
60
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
FWCI
6.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, student affect, flow theory, challenge-skill balance, student engagement, boredom, frustration, online learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review