Cited by 334Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education

Open access
Schiff, Daniel·2021·AI & SOCIETY

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Like previous educational technologies, artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) threatens to disrupt the status quo, with proponents highlighting the potential for efficiency and democratization, and skeptics warning of industrialization and alienation. However, unlike frequently discussed applications of AI in autonomous vehicles, military and cybersecurity concerns, and healthcare, AI's impacts on education policy and practice have not yet captured the public's attention. This paper, therefore, evaluates the status of AIEd, with special attention to intelligent tutoring systems and anthropomorphized artificial educational agents. I discuss AIEd's purported capacities, including the abilities to simulate teachers, provide robust student differentiation, and even foster socio-emotional engagement. Next, to situate developmental pathways for AIEd going forward, I contrast sociotechnical possibilities and risks through two idealized futures. Finally, I consider a recent proposal to use peer review as a gatekeeping strategy to prevent harmful research. This proposal serves as a jumping off point for recommendations to AIEd stakeholders towards improving their engagement with socially responsible research and implementation of AI in educational systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bolukbasi T Chang K-W Zou JY Saligrama V Kalai AT Lee DD Sugiyama M Luxburg UV Guyon I Garnett R Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings Advances in neural information processing systems 29 2016 New York Curran Associates Inc 4349 4357
  2. Buolamwini J, Gebru T (2018) Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pp 77–91
  3. Feenberg A (2008) The online education controversy. In: Conference on technology for learning, teaching and the institution
  4. Hao K (2019) China has started a grand experiment in AI education. it could reshape how the world learns. MIT Technology review
  5. Hecht B, Wilcox L, Bigham JP, Schöning J, Hoque E, De Russis L, Yarosh L, Anjum B, Contractor D, Wu C (2018) It’s time to do something: mitigating the negative impacts of computing through a change to the peer review process. ACM FCA (blog)
  6. Rangan VK, Lee KL (2011) Bridge International Academies: a school in a box. SSRN scholarly paper ID 2017973. Social Science Research Network, Rochester
  7. Rich E Knight K Artificial intelligence 1991 New York McGraw-Hill
  8. Rughinis R (2013) Gamification for productive interaction: reading and working with the Gamification debate in education. In: 2013 8th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI), pp 1–5. IEEE
  9. Simonite T (2013) Search under way for gold in online education data trove. MIT Technology Review

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiff, D.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Schiff, Daniel
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2020-08-09
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
331-348
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W3048335295
Cited by
334
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
23.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, intelligent tutoring systems, student differentiation, risks of AI in education, democratization of education, industrialization of education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review