Cited by 98Technology Use by Older AdultsSocial Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systems

Virtual Agents as Daily Assistants for Elderly or Cognitively Impaired People

Yaghoubzadeh, Ramin, Kramer, Marcel, Pitsch, Karola, Kopp, Stefan·2013·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yaghoubzadeh, R., Kramer, M., Pitsch, K., & Kopp, S.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2013
Pages
79-91
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W57349375
Cited by
98
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
virtual agents, assistive technology, elderly users, cognitive impairment, user acceptance, participatory design, speech understanding, daily living support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review