Creating ‘a Simple Conversation’: Designing a Conversational User Interface to Improve the Experience of Accessing Support for Study
Open accessAbstract
Administrative processes are ubiquitous in modern life and have been identified as a particular burden to those with accessibility needs. Students who have accessibility needs often have to understand guidance, fill in complex forms, and communicate with multiple parties to disclose disabilities and access appropriate support. Conversational user interfaces (CUIs) could allow us to reimagine such processes, yet there is currently limited understanding of how to design these to be accessible, or whether such an approach would be preferred. In the ADMINS (Assistants for the Disclosure and Management of Information about Needs and Support) project, we implemented a virtual assistant (VA) which is designed to enable students to disclose disabilities and to provide guidance and suggestions about appropriate support. ADMINS explores the potential of CUIs to reduce administrative burden and improve the experience of arranging support by replacing a static form with written or spoken dialogue. This article reports the results of two trials conducted during the project. A beta trial using an early version of the VA provided understanding of accessibility challenges and issues in user experience. The beta trial sample included 22 students who had already disclosed disabilities and 3 disability support advisors. After improvements to the design, a larger main trial was conducted with 134 students who disclosed their disabilities to the university using both the VA and the existing form-based process. The results show that the VA was preferred by most participants to completing the form (64.9% vs 23.9%). Qualitative and quantitative feedback from the trials also identified accessibility and user experience barriers for improving CUI design, and an understanding of benefits and preferences that can inform further development of accessible CUIs for this design space.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The administrative burden of seeking DSO accommodations acts as a substantial barrier, delaying or deterring interest in DSO support [54].
“Even so, the administrative burden encountered by those who do decide to seek accommodations from the DSO acts as a substantial barrier, delaying or even deterring interest in DSO support [54].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
What is participatory research?
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-s · Cited by 2,560 · see citing works
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458 · see citing works
The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future
Lewis, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 · Cited by 1,958 · see citing works
Luger, E., & Sellen, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858288 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice
Meyer, A. E., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2013) · Cited by 1,115 · see citing works
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications
Kelley, J. F. (1984) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/357417.357420 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Ribera, M., Porras, M., Boldú, M., Graells, M. T. I., Sulé, A., & París, P. (2009) · Data Technologies and Applications · doi:10.1108/00330330910998048 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Pradhan, A., Mehta, K., & Findlater, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174033 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Chatbots: changing user needs and motivations
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2018) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/3236669 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Perceptions and opinions of patients about mental health chatbots: scoping review
Abd-Alrazaq, A. A., Alajlani, M., Ali, N., Denecke, K., Bewick, B. M., & Househ, M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17828 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Suede: a Wizard of Oz prototyping tool for speech user interfaces
Klemmer, S. R., Sinha, A. K., Chen, J., Landay, J. A., Aboobaker, N., & Wang, A. (2000) · Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '00 · doi:10.1145/354401.354406 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
FAQ chatbot and inclusive learning in massive open online courses
Han, S., & Lee, M. K. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104395 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Kushalnagar, R. (2019) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_3 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Virtual Agents as Daily Assistants for Elderly or Cognitively Impaired People
Yaghoubzadeh, R., Kramer, M., Pitsch, K., & Kopp, S. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_7 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Accessible conversational user interfaces
Lister, K., Coughlan, T., Iniesto, F., Freear, N. D., & Devine, P. (2020) · International Web for All Conference (W4A) · doi:10.1145/3371300.3383343 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding and Measuring User Experience in Conversational Interfaces
Kocaballi, A. B., Laranjo, L., & Coiera, E. (2019) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwz015 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Hands free - care free: elderly people taking advantage of speech-only interaction
Wulf, L., Garschall, M., Himmelsbach, J., & Tscheligi, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational · doi:10.1145/2639189.2639251 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research
Parmanto, B. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21209 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Brewer, R. N. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519642 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
VERSE: Bridging Screen Readers and Voice Assistants for Enhanced Eyes-Free Web Search
Vtyurina, A., Fourney, A., Morris, M. R., Findlater, L., & White, R. W. (2019) · Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3308561.3353773 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Take-up of benefits and poverty: an evidence and policy review
Finn, D. J., & Goodship, J. (2014) · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Lister, K., Coughlan, T., Kenny, I., Tudor, R., & Iniesto, F. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11100587 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationBaldauf, M., Bösch, R., Frei, C., Hautle, F., & Jenny, M. (2018) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI Adjunct) · doi:10.1145/3236112.3236128 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Fiore, D., Baldauf, M., & Thiel, C. (2019) · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM) · doi:10.1145/3365610.3365617 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Usability of affective interfaces for a digital arts tutoring system
Lin, H.-C. K., Chen, N., Sun, R.-T., & Tsai, I.-H. (2012) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2012.702356 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The accessibility of administrative processes
Coughlan, T., & Lister, K. (2018) · International Web for All Conference (W4A) · doi:10.1145/3192714.3192820 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationGrussenmeyer, W., Garcia, J., Folmer, E., & Jiang, F. (2017) · International Web for All Conference (W4A) · doi:10.1145/3058555.3058570 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Practical Guide to Delivering Personalisation: Person-Centred Practice in Health and Social Care
Gardner, A. (2012) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs153 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Study of User Experience in Knowledge-Based QA Chatbot Design
Liu, R., & Dong, Z. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_89 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cognitive services to improve user experience in searching for academic information based on chatbot
Mamani, J. R. C., Alamo, Y. J. R., Armas-Aguirre, J., & Grandón, E. E. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON) · doi:10.1109/intercon.2019.8853572 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Implementing an accessible conversational user interface
Iniesto, F., Coughlan, T., & Lister, K. (2021) · International Web for All Conference (W4A) · doi:10.1145/3430263.3452431 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationLazar, J. K., Jaeger, P. T., Olalere, A., Algarne, M., Augustine, Z., Brown, C., D'Erasmo, F., Dotson, B., Endiape, G., Govender, L., et al. (2012) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/2307729.2307768 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Virtual assistants for mobile interaction
Siebra, C., Correia, W. F. M., Penha, M., Macêdo, J., Quintino, J. P., Anjos, M., Florentin, F., da Silva, F. Q. B., & Santos, A. L. M. (2018) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3292147.3292232 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Iniesto, F., Coughlan, T., Lister, K., & Holmes, W. (2020) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3373625.3418017 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationTrewin, S. M. (2019) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Carla Jessica Tin Gordon, Jeremy Brown, Elisabeth Fritzsch, and Shirley Gabber. 2016. Wochat chatbot user experi- ence summary. In Proc. WOCHAT.
- Jingya Guo, Da Tao, and Chen Yang. 2019. The effects of continuous conversation and task complexity on usability of an ai-based conversational agent in smart home environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering. Springer, Singapore, 695-703.
- James R. Lewis. 2016. Standardized questionnaires for voice interaction design. Voice Interaction Design 1 (2016), 1.
- Anton Lilleby, Steffen Marstein, and Guri Verne. 2021. They often avoid text. Chatbot for Young Adults with Dyslexia. Scandinavian Workshop on E-Government. ITU Copenhagen.
- Susan Moore. 2018. Gartner says 25 percent of customer service operations will use virtual customer assistants by 2020. Article on Gartner.Com. Available online at https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-02-19- gartner-says-25-percent-of-customer-service-operations-will-use-virtual-customer-assistants-by-2020.
- Ranci Ren. 2019. Experimental study of socio chatbot usability (Master's thesis).
- Julia Saenz, Walker Burgess, Elizabeth Gustitis, Andres Mena, and Farzan Sasan-Gohar. 2017. The usability analysis of chatbot technologies for internal personnel communications. In Proceedings of the IIE Annual Conference. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), 1357-1362.
- Tuva Lunde Smestad. 2018. Personality matters! improving the user experience of chatbot interfaces-personality provides a stable pattern to guide the design and behaviour of conversational agents (master's thesis, NTNU).
- Jeff Stanley, Ronna ten Brink, Alexandra Valiton, Trevor Bostic, and Becca Scollan. 2022. Chatbot accessibility guid- ance: A review and way forward. In Proceedings of 6th International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Springer, Singapore, 919-942.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What distance learning students want from an AI Digital Assistant
Rienties, B., Domingue, J., Duttaroy, S., Herodotou, C., Tessarolo, F. M., & Whitelock, D. M. (2024) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2024.2338717 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A Review of Subjective Scales Measuring the User Experience of Voice Assistants
Faruk, L. I. D., Babakerkhell, M. D., Mongkolnam, P., Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V., Funilkul, S., & Pal, D. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3358423 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Atcheson, A., Khan, O., Siemann, B., Jain, A., & Karahalios, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714121 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Coughlan, T., Iniesto, F., & Carr, J. E. (2024) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/jime.836 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationCoughlan, T., & Iniesto, F. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationMulti-Tool Analysis of User Interface & Accessibility in Deployed Web-Based Chatbots
Rajmohan, M., Desai, S., & Das, S. (2025) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3719160.3737641 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Systematic Mapping Study about Technologies for Hedonic Aspects Evaluation in Text-based Chatbots
Mariano, P. A. D. L., Souza, A., Guerino, G. C., Chaves, A. P., & Valentim, N. (2024) · Journal on Interactive Systems · doi:10.5753/jis.2024.4350 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lei, C. L., & Dickson-Deane, C. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61672-3_3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.04 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
1. The Higher Education Landscape
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.01 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Technologies to Support Self-determination for People with Intellectual Disability and ASD
Laronze, F., Landuran, A., & N’Kaoua, B. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55245-8_2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.00 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Quality of Service Enhancement in Mobile Crowdsensing Through Metaheuristic Techniques: A Survey
Ghahremani, H., Damrudi, M., Ghaffari, A., & Aval, K. J. (2025) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.70168 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hidayah, N., Talakua, P., Azis, D. A., & Maipauw, M. M. (2025) · JURNAL Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika · doi:10.52434/jpif.v5i1.42588 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Exploration on the Integration and Innovation of Art Design and User Experience
(2023) · International Journal of Art Innovation and Development · doi:10.38007/ijaid.2023.040206
3. Institutional Systems, Disability Services, and the Tensions of Self-Advocacy and Disclosure
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.03
2. Terminology, Categories, and Complicating Factors
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.02
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.05
7. Curricular Support Strategies
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.07
6. Intersectional Considerations
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.06
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.08
Lierman, A. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0420.09
Iniesto, F., & Rodrigo, C. (2025) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5658-5_37
Self-citationDigital transformation in education: Higher education for everyone
Eileen Scanlon, A. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-32964-7.00001-4
A Framework for Interactive Machine Learning and Enhanced Conversational Systems
Conn, P., Robinson, J. Y., Abisla, R., Cattiau, J., Batra, S., & Phan, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29653-5_13
- Authors
- Iniesto, F., Coughlan, T., Lister, K., Devine, P., Freear, N., Greenwood, R., Holmes, W., Kenny, I., McLeod, K., & Tudor, R.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Arden University (GB)
- AbilityNet (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
- Published
- 2023-03-28
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 1936-7228 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-7236
- OpenAlex
- W4306174599
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 14.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- UNED repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- conversational interfaces, virtual assistants, accessibility, disability disclosure, disability services, university students, administrative burden, accessibility needs, user experience, spoken dialogue
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
