Cited by 47Speech and dialogue systemsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Dialogue Systems and Conversational Agents for Patients with Dementia: The Human–Robot Interaction

Open access
Russo, Alessandro, D'Onofrio, Grazia, Gangemi, Aldo, Giuliani, Francesco, Mongiovi, Misael, Ricciardi, Francesco, Greco, Francesca, Cavallo, Filippo +4 more·2019·Rejuvenation Research

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and describe the fundamental characteristics of spoken dialogue systems, and their role in supporting human–robot interaction and enabling the communication between socially assistive robots and patients with dementia. First, this work provides an overview of spoken dialogue systems by considering the underlying technologies, approaches, methods, and general issues. Then, the analysis focuses on studies, systems, and approaches that have investigated the role of dialogue systems and conversational agents in the interaction with elderly people with dementia by presenting the results of a literature review. While the overview of spoken dialogue systems relies on existing surveys and reviews, a research was conducted to identify existing works in the literature that have investigated the role of conversational agents and dialogue systems in the elderly and people with cognitive impairments. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) use of conversational agents, dialogue systems, or language processing tools for people with cognitive impairments; (2) age ≥60 years; (3) diagnosis of dementia according to National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIAAA) criteria; (4) presence of tests or experiments with qualitative or quantitative results. Initially 125 studies published between 2000 and 2017 were identified, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria. The review identifies the issues and challenges that are reported when conversational agents and speech-based interfaces have been used for interacting with people with cognitive impairments. In addition, the review led to the identification of studies that have investigated speech processing and natural language processing capabilities to assess the cognitive status of people with dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/rej.2018.2075

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russo, A., D'Onofrio, G., Gangemi, A., Giuliani, F., Mongiovi, M., Ricciardi, F., Greco, F., Cavallo, F., Dario, P., Sancarlo, D., Presutti, V., & Greco, A.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza,” San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
  • Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab), Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technology (ISTC)—National Research Council (CNR), Rome, Italy.
  • Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Venue
Rejuvenation Research
Published
2019-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
109-120
ISSN
  • 1094-5458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1684
  • 1557-8577
OpenAlex
W2883096944
Cited by
47
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rejuvenation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
spoken dialogue systems, chatbots, human-robot interaction, dementia, socially assistive robots, older adults, cognitive impairment, speech interfaces, natural language processing, speech processing, cognitive status assessment
MeSH terms
Automation, Communication, Dementia, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Robotics, Speech Recognition Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review