Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5,751

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Entity Relationship Model — Toward a Unified View of Data

Chen, Peter Pin-Shan·2002·Software Pioneers
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_18
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_18

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. ABRIAL, J.R. Data semantics. In Data Base Management, J.W. Klimbie and K.L. Koffeman, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 1–60.
  2. BACHMAN, C.W. Software for random access processing. Datamation 11 (April 1965), 36–41.
  3. BACHMAN, C.W. Data structure diagrams. Data Base 1, 2 (Summer 1969), 4–10. · DOI · Paper page
  4. BACHMAN, C.W. Trends in database management—1975. Proc., AFIPS 1975 NCC, Vol. 44, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 569–576.
  5. BIRKHOFF, G., AND BARTEE, T.C. Modern Applied Algebra. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
  6. CHAMBERLIN, D.D., AND RAYMOND, F.B. SEQUEL: A structured English query language. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD 1974, Workshop, Ann Arbor, Michigan, May, 1974.
  7. CODASYL. Data base task group report. ACM, New York, 1971.
  8. CODD, E.F. Normalized data base structure: A brief tutorial. Proc. ACM-SIGFIDET 1971, Workshop, San Diego, Calif., Nov. 1971, pp. 1–18.
  9. CODD, E.F. A data base sublanguage founded on the relational calculus. Proc, ACM-SIG- FIDET 1971, Workshop, San Diego, Calif., Nov. 1971, pp. 35–68.
  10. CODD, E.F. Recent investigations in relational data base systems. Proc. IFIP Congress 1974, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 1017–1021.
  11. DEHENEFFE, C., HENNEBERT, H., AND PAULUS, W. Relational model for data base. Proc. IFIP Congress 1974, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 1022–1025.
  12. DODD, G.G. APL—a language for associate data handling in PL/I. Proc. AFIPS 1966 FJCC, Vol. 29, Spartan Books, New York, pp. 677–684. · doi:10.1145/1464291.1464363
  13. ESWARAN, K.P., AND CHAMBERLIN, D.D. Functional specifications of a subsystem for data base integrity. Proc. Very Large Data Base Conf., Framingham, Mass., Sept. 1975, pp. 48–68.
  14. HAINAUT, J.L., AND LECHARLIER, B. An extensible semantic model of data base and its data language. Proc. IFIP Congress 1974, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 1026–1030.
  15. HAMMER, M.M., AND MCLEOD, D.J. Semantic integrity in a relation data base system. Proc. Very Large Data Base Conf., Framingham, Mass., Sept. 1975, pp. 25–47.
  16. LINDGREEN, P. Basic operations on information as a basis for data base design. Proc. IFIP Congress 1974, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 993–997.
  17. MEALY, G.H. Another look at data base. Proc. AFIPS 1967 FJCC, Vol. 31, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 525–534. · doi:10.1145/1465611.1465682
  18. NIJSSEN, G.M. Data structuring in the DDL and the relational model. In Data Base Management, J.W. Klimbie and K.L. Koffeman, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 363–379.
  19. OLLE, T.W. Current and future trends in data base management systems. Proc. IFIP Congress 1974, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 998–1006.
  20. ROUSSOPOULOS, N., AND MYLOPOULOS, J. Using semantic networks for data base management. Proc. Very Large Data Base Conf., Framingham, Mass., Sept. 1975, pp. 144–172.
  21. RUSTIN, R. (Ed.). Proc. ACM-SOGMOD 1974—debate on data models. Ann Arbor, Mich., May 1974.
  22. SCHMID, H.A., AND SWENSON, J.R. On the semantics of the relational model. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD 1975, Conference, San Jose, Calif., May 1975, pp. 211–233.
  23. SENKO, M.E. Data description language in the concept of multilevel structured description: DIAM II with FORAL. In Data Base Description, B.C.M. Dougue, and G.M. Nijssen, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 239–258.
  24. SENKO, M.E., ALTMAN, E.B., ASTRAHAN, M.M., AND FEHDER, P.L. Data structures and accessing in data-base systems. IBM Syst. J. 12, 1 (1973), 30–93. · DOI · Paper page
  25. SIBLEY, E.H. On the equivalence of data base systems. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD 1974 debate on data models, Ann Arbor, Mich., May 1974, pp. 43–76.
  26. STEEL, T.B. Data base standardization—a status report. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD 1975, Conference, San Jose, Calif., May 1975, pp. 65–78. · DOI
  27. STONBBBAKER, M. Implementation of integrity constraints and views by query modification. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD 1975, Conference, San Jose, Calif., May 1975, pp. 65–78.
  28. SUNDGREN, B. Conceptual foundation of the infoiogical approach to data bases. In Data Base Management, J.W. Klimbie and K.L. Koffeman, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 61–95.
  29. TAYLOR, R.W. Observations on the attributes of database sets. In Data Base Description, B.C.M. Dougue and G.M. Nijssen, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 73–84.
  30. TSICHRITZIS, D. A network framework for relation implementation. In Data Base Description, B.C.M. Douge and G.M. Nijssen, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 269–282.

Cited by

See all 5,751

Metadata

Authors
Chen, P. P.-S.
Venue
Software Pioneers
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2002
Pages
311-339
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_18
OpenAlex
W2144192824
Cited by
5,751
References
1
FWCI
509.76
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Entity Relationship Model — Toward a Unified View of Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_18
The paper
Chen, P. P.-S. (2002). The Entity Relationship Model — Toward a Unified View of Data. Software Pioneers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_18

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.