Cited by 12Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEmotions and Moral BehaviorPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The Unique Human Capacity for Emotional Awareness: Psychological, Neuroanatomical, Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives

Steklis, Horst Dieter, Lane, Richard D.·2012·The Science of the Mind

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-4-431-54123-3_8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Steklis, H. D., & Lane, R. D.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Steklis, Horst Dieter
Venue
The Science of the Mind
Published
2012
Pages
165-205
ISSN
  • 2192-6646 (ISSN-L)
  • 2192-6654
OpenAlex
W146246222
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The science of the mind (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
emotional awareness, shared intentionality, emotional sharing, mentalization, cognitive empathy, medial prefrontal cortex, human cognition, individual differences, self-regulation, social behavior, ontogeny, comparative psychology, evolution of emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review