Cited by 1,827Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

The Social Brain: Neural Basis of Social Knowledge

Open access
Adolphs, Ralph·2009·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Social cognition in humans is distinguished by psychological processes that allow us to make inferences about what is going on inside other people—their intentions, feelings, and thoughts. Some of these processes likely account for aspects of human social behavior that are unique, such as our culture and civilization. Most schemes divide social information processing into those processes that are relatively automatic and driven by the stimuli, versus those that are more deliberative and controlled, and sensitive to context and strategy. These distinctions are reflected in the neural structures that underlie social cognition, where there is a recent wealth of data primarily from functional neuroimaging. Here I provide a broad survey of the key abilities, processes, and ways in which to relate these to data from cognitive neuroscience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514

Cites

193 of 193 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The social brain has a strong influence on the multisensory integration underlying PPS representation.

    “These findings suggest a strong influence of the “social brain” (Adolphs 2009) on the multisensory integration underlying PPS representation.”
  • There exists a network of brain regions consistently involved in social cognitive processes.

    “Although this idea remains contentious, there exists a network of brain regions consistently involved in social cognitive processes (Adolphs 2009, Frith 2007).”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Adolphs 2009

  • It is possible that social interactions shape the experience we have of our body.

    “The body is our interface with others (see e.g., Adolphs, 2009;Decety & Lamm, 2007;Gallese, Keysers, & Rizzolatti, 2004;Saxe, 2006), and therefore it is possible that social interactions shape the experience we have of our body (Ambrosini, Blomberg, Mandrigin, & Costantini, 2013;Cardellicchio, Sinigaglia, & Costantini, 2012;Cardini, Tajadura-Jimenez, Serino, & Tsakiris, 2012;Costantini, Ambrosini,”
  • In humans, social network size significantly correlates with grey matter density of regions constituting the social brain, including the amygdala and posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS).

    “In humans, studies have shown that social network size significantly correlates with grey matter density of regions constituting the social brain”

    From Baboons (Papio anubis) living in larger social groups have bigger brains. (2021) · cites this paper as Adolphs, 2009

  • Touch promotes the development and connectivity of brain areas associated with social cognition and the social brain.

    “Recent findings suggest that touch also promotes the development and connectivity of brain areas (Brauer et al., 2016; Björnsdotter et al., 2014) associated with social cognition and the “social brain” (Adolphs, 2009, Brothers, 2002, Frith, 2007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 194 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Allman JM, 1999, Evolving Brains
  2. Atkinson AP, 2008, The Science of Social Vision
  3. Brothers L, 1990, Concepts Neurosci., 1, 27
  4. Craig AD, 2008, Handbook of Emotions, 272
  5. Suddendorf T, 1997, Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr., 123, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adolphs, R.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Adolphs, Ralph
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
693-716
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2128662472
Cited by
1,827
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 171 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 94
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080721, R01MH067681)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS019632)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social cognition, social brain, theory of mind, mentalization, automatic versus controlled processing, functional neuroimaging, social information processing, human social behavior
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Biological Evolution, Facial Expression, Humans, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Prefrontal Cortex, Personal Construct Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review