Cited by 659Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationEmotions and Moral Behavior

Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution

Smith, Adam·2006·The Psychological Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03395534

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A.
Corresponding author
Smith, Adam
Venue
The Psychological Record
Published
2006-01
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
3-21
ISSN
  • 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-3452
OpenAlex
W1531773291
Cited by
654
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
  • OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
cognitive empathy, affective empathy, perspective taking, vicarious emotions, human evolution, natural selection, autism spectrum disorder, antisocial personality disorder, schizoid personality disorder, Williams syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review