Cited by 3Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingSpaceflight effects on biologySpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

Quorum Sensing in Life Support Systems: The MELiSSA Loop

Catachura, Sandra C., Leys, Natalie, Mastroleo, Felice·2018·Quorum Sensing and its Biotechnological Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-13-0848-2_16

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Catachura, S. C., Leys, N., & Mastroleo, F.
Affiliations
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE)
Corresponding author
Mastroleo, Felice
Venue
Quorum Sensing and its Biotechnological Applications
Published
2018
Pages
249-260
OpenAlex
W2887637919
Cited by
3
References
44
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
quorum sensing, Melissa, CELSS, spacecraft life support, bioreactor design, ionizing radiation effects, cyanobacteria, bacteria, long-duration spaceflight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review