Cited by 1,060Gut microbiota and healthFood composition and propertiesMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon

Open access
Ze, Xiaolei, Duncan, Sylvia H, Louis, Petra, Flint, Harry J·2012·The ISME Journal

Abstract

The release of energy from particulate substrates such as dietary fiber and resistant starch (RS) in the human colon may depend on the presence of specialist primary degraders (or ‘keystone species’) within the microbial community. We have explored the roles of four dominant amylolytic bacteria found in the human colon in the degradation and utilization of resistant starches. Eubacterium rectale and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron showed limited ability to utilize RS2- and RS3-resistant starches by comparison with Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Ruminococcus bromii. In co-culture, however, R. bromii proved unique in stimulating RS2 and RS3 utilization by the other three bacterial species, even in a medium that does not permit growth of R. bromii itself. Having previously demonstrated low RS3 fermentation in vivo in two individuals with undetectable populations of R. bromii-related bacteria, we show here that supplementation of mixed fecal bacteria from one of these volunteers with R. bromii, but not with the other three species, greatly enhanced the extent of RS3 fermentation in vitro. This argues strongly that R. bromii has a pivotal role in fermentation of RS3 in the human large intestine, and that variation in the occurrence of this species and its close relatives may be a primary cause of variable energy recovery from this important component of the diet. This work also indicates that R. bromii possesses an exceptional ability to colonize and degrade starch particles when compared with previously studied amylolytic bacteria from the human colon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ismej.2012.4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are many key functions that are only carried out by a relatively small number of microbiota species, with examples including oxalate and resistant-starch degradation.

    “there are many key functions that are only carried out by a relatively small number of microbiota species. Examples include oxalate 31 and resistant-starch 32 degradation.”

    From Human microbiome myths and misconceptions (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Le Leu RK, Hu Y, Brown IL, Young GP. (2009). Effect of high amylose maize starches on colonic fermentation and apoptotic response to DNA-damage in the colon of rats. Nutr Metab 6: 11 doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-6-11. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ze, X., Duncan, S. H., Louis, P., & Flint, H. J.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Flint, Harry J
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2012-02-16
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
1535-1543
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2094379365
Cited by
1,060
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The ISME Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division
  • Scottish Government
  • University of Aberdeen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
Ruminococcus bromii, resistant starch, RS3, RS2, keystone species, amylolytic bacteria, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Eubacterium rectale, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, colonic fermentation, starch degradation
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Colon, Feces, Fermentation, Humans, Species Specificity, Starch, Time Factors, Coculture Techniques, Ruminococcus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review