CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Agrarian Question of Gendered Labour

Ossome, Lyn, Naidu, Sirisha·2021·Labour Questions in the Global South
DOI 10.1007/978-981-33-4635-2_4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-33-4635-2_4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exponential growth of the surplus population under neoliberalism has deepened the general level of reliance on unremunerated gendered labour necessary to ensure survival of this population.

    “given that the need for reproduction of human life exists whether or not people are employed by capital, the exponential growth of the surplus population under neoliberalism has deepened the general level of reliance on unremunerated gendered labour necessary to ensure survival of this population.”

    From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Ossome and Naidu (2021, p. 81)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Akram-Lodhi, A. H., & Kay, C. (2010). Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 2): Current Debates and beyond. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(2), 255–284. · DOI
  2. Araghi, F. (2009). Accumulation by Displacement, Global Enclosures, Food Crisis, and the Ecological Contradictions of Capitalism. Review, 32(1), 113–146.
  3. Bernstein, H. (2004). Changing before our very eyes: Agrarian questions and the politics of land in capitalism today. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(1–2), 190–225. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bernstein, H. (2016). Agrarian Political Economy and Modern World Capitalism: the Contributions of Food Regime Analysis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(3), 611–647. · DOI
  5. Bryceson, D. F. (2000). Peasant Theories and Smallholder Policies: Past and Present. In D. F. Bryceson, C. Kay, & J. Mooij (Eds.), Disappearing Peasantries: Rural Labour in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: IT Publications. · DOI
  6. Chayanov, A. V. (1986). The Theory of Peasant Economy. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  7. Deere, C. D. (1976). Rural Women’s Subsistence Production in Capitalist Periphery. Review of Radical Political Economy, 8(9), 9–17. · DOI
  8. Dickinson, J., & Russell, B. (1986). The Structure of Reproduction in Capitalist Societies. In J. Dickinson & B. Russell (Eds.), Family, Economy and the State: Social Reproduction under Capitalism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  9. Ellis, F. (1998). Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38. · DOI
  10. Foster, J. B., McChesney, R. W., & Jonna, R. J. (2011). The Global Reserve Army of Labor and the New Imperialism. Monthly Review, 63(6), 1–31. · DOI
  11. Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of Capital and Care. New Left Review, 100, 99–117.
  12. Harris-White, B. (2012). Capitalism and the Common Man: Peasants and Petty Production in Africa and South Asia. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 1(2), 109–160.
  13. Kay, C. (2000). Latin America’s Agrarian Transformation: Peasantization and Proletarianization. In D. F. Bryceson, C. Kay, & J. Mooij (Eds.), Disappearing Peasantries: Rural Labour in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: IT Publications.
  14. Lerche, J. (2013). The Agrarian Question in Neoliberal India: Agrarian Transition Bypassed?. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3), 382–404. · DOI
  15. Levien, M. (2015). From Primitive Accumulation to Regimes of Dispossession: Six Theses on India’s Land Question. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(22), 146–157.
  16. Li, T. M. (2009). To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations. Antipode, 41(S1), 66–93.
  17. Luxemburg, R. (1951). The Accumulation of Capital. London: Routledge.
  18. Marx, K. (1977). Capital (Vol. I). New York: Vintage Books.
  19. Marx, K. (1986). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Vol. 1). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
  20. McIntyre, M. (2011). Race, Surplus Population and the Marxist Theory of Imperialism. Antipode, 43(5), 1489–1515. · DOI
  21. McIntyre, M., & Nast, H. J. (2011). Bio (Necro) Polis: Marx, Surplus Populations, and the Spatial Dialectics of Reproduction and “Race”. Antipode, 43(5), 1465–1488. · DOI
  22. Mies, M. (2014). Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books. · DOI
  23. Mingione, E. (1985). Ch. 1: Social Reproduction of the Surplus Labour Force: The Case of Southern Italy. In N. Redclift & E. Mingione (Eds.), Beyond Employment: Household, Gender and Subsistence (pp. 14–54). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  24. Mooij, J. (2000). Changing Peasantries in Asia. In D. F. Bryceson, C. Kay, & J. Mooij (Eds.), Disappearing Peasantries: Rural Labour in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: IT Publications.
  25. Moyo, S., & Yeros, P. (2005). Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books. · DOI
  26. Moyo, S., Yeros, P., & Jha, P. (2012). Imperialism and Primitive Accumulation: Notes on the New Scramble for Africa. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 1(2), 181–203.
  27. Moyo, S., Jha, P., & Yeros, P. (2013). The Classical Agrarian Question: Myth, Reality and Relevance Today. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 2(1), 93–119.
  28. Naidu, S.C. (2018, June 19–21). Understanding Social Reproduction: Nature, Labour and Capitalist Accumulation. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the International Association of Feminist Economics, New Paltz, NY.
  29. Naidu, S. C., & Ossome, L. (2016). Social Reproduction and the Agrarian Question of women’s Labour in India. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 5(1), 50–76.
  30. Naidu, S. C., & Ossome, L. (2018). Work, Gender and Immiseration in South Africa and India. Review of Radical Political Economics, 50, 332–348. · DOI
  31. O’Laughlin, B. (1996). Through a Divided Glass: Dualism and the Agrarian Question in Mozambique. Journal of Peasant Studies, 23(4), 1–39. · DOI
  32. Quick, P. (2004). Subsistence Wages and Household Production: Clearing the Way for an Analysis of Class and Gender. Review of Radical Political Economics, 36(1), 20–36. · DOI
  33. Ramachandran, V. K. (2011). The State of Agrarian Relations in India Today. The Marxist, 27(1–2), 51–89.
  34. Saka, B. (2014). Petty Commodity Production in the Neoliberal Phase of Global Capitalism: The Case of Grape Production. In Çanakkale, A. Bonanno & J. S. B Cavalcanti (Eds.), Labor Relations in Globalized Food (Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Vol. 20), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-192220140000020004 · DOI
  35. Shah, A., & Harris-White, B. (2011). Resurrecting Scholarship on Agrarian Transformations. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(39), 13–18.
  36. Tyner, J. A. (2013). Population Geography I: Surplus Populations. Progress in Human Geography, 37(5), 701–711. · DOI
  37. Tyner, J. A. (2016). Population Geography III? Precarity, Dead Peasants and Truncated Life. Progress in Human Geography, 40(2), 275–289. · DOI
  38. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  39. Yates, M. (2011). The Human-as-Waste, the Labor Theory of Value and Disposability in Contemporary Capitalism. Antipode, 43(5), 1679–1695. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ossome, L., & Naidu, S.
Venue
Labour Questions in the Global South
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published
2021
Pages
63-86
DOI
10.1007/978-981-33-4635-2_4
Cited by
50
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review