‘Changing Before Our Very Eyes’: Agrarian Questions and the Politics of Land in Capitalism Today
Abstract
This paper endorses the criticisms of neo‐classical populism and its advocacy of redistributive land reform provided by other contributions to this special issue of the Journal, to which it adds several further points. If GKI propose a version of an agrarian question of ‘small’ or ‘family’ farming, and its resolution through a familiar (Chayanovian) path of development, much of the critique rests, in one way or another, on the ‘classic’ agrarian question in capitalist transition, in effect the agrarian question of capital in which the agrarian question of labour was once subsumed. Here the question is posed whether, in the conditions of contemporary ‘globalization’ and its tendency to the ‘fragmentation’ of labour, there might be a new agrarian question of labour, now detached from that of capital, and which generates a new politics of struggles over land (and its distribution). Even to conceive of this question is beyond the analytical and political field of vision of neo‐classical populism. Some of the dimensions of an agrarian question of labour are illustrated in a brief consideration of recent, and highly contradictory, events in Zimbabwe: a unique case of comprehensive, regime‐sanctioned, confiscatory land redistribution in the world today.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Those 'hanging in' or 'dropping out' include a wider group of 'footloose labour', linked to a 'semi-peasantry' unable to socially reproduce.
“Those 'hanging in' or 'dropping out', by contrast, include a wider group of 'footloose labour', linked to a 'semi-peasantry' unable to socially reproduce (Cousins et al., 1992;Bernstein, 2004).”
From Livelihood Change in Rural Zimbabwe over 20 Years (2012) · cites this paper as Bernstein, 2004
Cites
The Political Economy of Land Acquisition and Redistribution in Zimbabwe, 1990-1999
Moyo, S. (2000) · Journal of Southern African Studies · doi:10.1080/030570700108351 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Missing men? The debate over rural poverty and women‐headed households in Southern Africa
O'laughlin, B. (1998) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066159808438665 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Land Occupation Movement and Democratisation in Zimbabwe: Contradictions of Neoliberalism
Moyo, S. (2001) · Millennium: Journal of International Studies · doi:10.1177/03058298010300021001 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Social differentiation in the communal lands of Zimbabwe
Cousins, B., Weiner, D., & Amin, N. (1992) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056249208703936 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Livelihoods after Land Reform in Zimbabwe: Understanding Processes of Rural Differentiation
SCOONES, I., MARONGWE, N., MAVEDZENGE, B., MURIMBARIMBA, F., MAHENEHENE, J., & SUKUME, C. (2012) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00358.x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Livelihood Change in Rural Zimbabwe over 20 Years
Mushongah, J., & Scoones, I. (2012) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.671474 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bernstein, H.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bernstein, Henry
- ORCID
- Bernstein, Henry
- Venue
- Journal of Agrarian Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-19
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 190-225
- ISSN
- 1471-0358 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0366
- OpenAlex
- W1965828070
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 20.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Agrarian Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
- Keywords
- agrarian question, land politics, Chayanov, globalization, land redistribution, family farming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review