Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the Special Issue

Entwistle, N. J.·1991·Higher Education
DOI 10.1007/bf00132287
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00132287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  2. Entwistle, N. J. (1987). ?A model of the teaching-learning process?, in Richardson, J. T. E., Eysenck, M. W., and Warren Piper, D. (eds.), Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. London: S.R.H.E./Open University Press, pp. 13?28.
  3. Entwistle, N. J. (in press). ?Influences on the quality of student learning: implications for medical education?. South African Medical Journal.
  4. Entwistle, N. J., and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
  5. Entwistle, N. J., and Tait, H. (1990). ?Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments?, Higher Education 19, 169?194. · DOI
  6. Marton, F., and Säljö, R. (1976). ?On qualitative differences in learning. I - Outcome and process?, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4?11. · DOI
  7. Marton, F., and Säljö, R. (1984). ?Approaches to learning?, in Marton, F., Hounsell, D.J. and Entwistle, N.J. (eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, pp. 36?55.
  8. Meyer, J. H. F., and Muller, M. W. (1990). ?Evaluating the quality of student learning. I - An unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying at an individual level?, Studies in Higher Education 15, 131?154. · DOI
  9. Pask, G. (1976). ?Styles and strategies of learning?, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 128?148. · DOI
  10. Ramsden, P. (1981). ?A study of the relationship between student learning and its academic context?. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Lancaster.
  11. Schmeck, R. R. (ed.) (1988). Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum.
  12. Taylor, E. (1983). ?Orientations to study: a longitudinal interview investigation of students in two human studies degree courses at Surrey University?. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Surrey.
  13. Thomas, P. (1986). ?The structures and stability of learning approaches?. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Entwistle, N. J.
Venue
Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1991-10
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
201-204
ISSN
  • 0018-1560
  • 1573-174X
DOI
10.1007/bf00132287
Cited by
277
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.