Cited by 134Online Learning and AnalyticsInnovative Teaching MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Analytics of time management strategies in a flipped classroom

Open access
Ahmad Uzir, Nora'ayu, Gašević, Dragan, Matcha, Wannisa, Jovanović, Jelena, Pardo, Abelardo·2020·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

This paper aims to explore time management strategies followed by students in a flipped classroom through the analysis of trace data. Specifically, an exploratory study was conducted on the dataset collected in three consecutive offerings of an undergraduate computer engineering course (N= 1,134). Trace data about activities were initially coded for the timeliness of activity completion. Such data were then analysed using agglomerative hierarchical clustering based on Ward's algorithm, first order Markov chains, and inferential statistics to (a) detect time management tactics and strategies from students' learning activities and (b) analyse the effects of personalized analytics‐based feedback on time management. The results indicate that meaningful and theoretically relevant time management patterns can be detected from trace data as manifestations of students' tactics and strategies. The study also showed that time management tactics had significant associations with academic performance and were associated with different interventions in personalized analytics‐based feedback.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcal.12392

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The idea was that by working on assignments during class there would be more accountability as evaluations will take place during instructional time and under instructional supervision with no opportunity or incentive for dishonesty.

    “The idea was that by working on assignments during class there would be more accountability as evaluations will take place during instructional time and under instructional supervision with no opportunity or incentive for dishonesty [1, 6].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad Uzir, N., Gašević, D., Matcha, W., Jovanović, J., & Pardo, A.
Affiliations
  • School of Informatics The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-10
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
70-88
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W2980121951
Cited by
129
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8
FWCI
17.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences (RFOS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
time management strategies, flipped classroom, learning analytics, trace data, student learning activity, academic performance, computer engineering education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review