Cited by 885Evaluation of Teaching PracticesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsHigher Education Research Studies

Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness

Open access
Baeten, Marlies, Kyndt, Eva, Struyven, Katrien, Dochy, Filip·2010·Educational Research Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baeten, M., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2009). Student teachers' approaches to learning in relation to their motivation and their perceived competence. Paper presented at the conference of the International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching, Rovaniemi, Finland.
  2. Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
  3. Tetik, C., Gurpinar, E., & Bati, H. (2009). Students' learning approaches at medical schools applying different curricula in Turkey. Kuwait Medical Journal, 41(4), 311-316.
  4. Valk, A., & Marandi, T. (2005). How to support deep learning at a university? In F. E. H. Tay, T. S. Chuan, & S. Han-Ming (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on education 2005. National University of Singapore.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Baeten, Marlies
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
243-260
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111371909
Cited by
885
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 37
FWCI
143.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
deep learning, student-centered learning, approach to learning, student perceptions, course quality, teacher orientation, personality traits, intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, self-confidence, student age, humanities students, teaching methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review