Cited by 73Evaluation of Teaching PracticesInnovative Teaching MethodsEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Students’ likes and dislikes regarding student-activating and lecture-based educational settings: consequences for students’ perceptions of the learning environment, student learning and performance

Struyven, Katrien, Dochy, Filip, Janssens, Steven·2008·European Journal of Psychology of Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03173001

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Struyven, Katrien
  • Dochy, Filip
  • Janssens, Steven
Venue
European Journal of Psychology of Education
Published
2008-09
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
295-317
ISSN
  • 0256-2928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5174
OpenAlex
W1994730208
Cited by
73
References
97
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
lecture method, student perceptions of teaching, student learning, academic performance, learning environment, assessment practices, teaching methods, student preferences, Course Experience Questionnaire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review