Cited by 1,537Phenomenology and Existential PhilosophyQualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative Research Methods and Applications

Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data

Hycner, Richard H.·1985·Human Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00142995

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hycner, R. H.
Corresponding author
Hycner, Richard H.
Venue
Human Studies
Published
1985
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
279-303
ISSN
  • 0163-8548 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-851X
OpenAlex
W2169603190
Cited by
1,537
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 60
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
phenomenological analysis, interview data, qualitative data analysis, phenomenological research, research methodology guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review