Cited by 43Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsWorkplace Violence and Bullying

A hermeneutic phenomenological study of students’ and school counsellors’ ‘lived experiences’ of cyberbullying and bullying

Chan, N.N., Ahrumugam, P., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Ooi, P.B.·2020·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103755

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, N. N., Ahrumugam, P., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Ooi, P. B.
Affiliations
  • Quest International University Perak (MY)
  • Sunway University (MY)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Chan, N.N.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
146
Pages
103755
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987662106
Cited by
43
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sunway University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
cyberbullying, bullying, lived experience, school counselors, high school students, bystanders, moral disengagement, WhatsApp groups, lifeworld, Malaysia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review