Risk factors for breast cancer by age and menopausal status: a case-control study in Singapore
Abstract
A case-control study was conducted among Singapore Chinese women, comprised of 200 histologically confirmed cases of breast cancer and 420 hospital controls. Subjects were interviewed on family history of breast cancer, social and demographic characteristics, reproductive history, and diet one year prior to interview. Differences in risk factors were observed according to menopausal status. In the premenopausal group, the most consistently significant nondietary effect was an increased risk with late age at first birth. In postmenopausal women, the most consistent nondietary effects were increased risks with nulliparity, tall stature, high educational status, and a family history of breast cancer. In premenopausal women, the strongest dietary effects were low risks with high intakes of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), beta-carotene, soya protein as a proportion of all protein, and a high risk with high red-meat intake. No dietary effects were observed in postmenopausal women. Examination of effects by 10-year age groups suggested that the differences in the effects of age at first birth, nulliparity, height, education, beta-carotene intake, and PUFA intake between premenopausal and postmenopausal women were at least partly attributable to age-related differences in the baseline distributions of these variables. The variation in the effects of red meat and soya protein appeared to be attributable mainly to menopausal status itself, which is consistent with the hypothesis th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eight of 12 (67%) studies examining high soy food or protein and six of seven (86%) studies examining high soy isoflavones reported inverse associations between soy and breast cancer risk.
“Eight of 12 (67%) studies examining high soy food or protein [45,46,61,64,72,77,78,81] and six of seven (86%) studies examining high soy isoflavones [42,43,45,75,77,81] reported inverse associations between soy and breast cancer risk.”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [64]
Among case-control studies reporting odds ratios with confidence intervals, 11 of 19 (58%) showed significant inverse relationships between soy food or protein intake and breast cancer risk.
“Of the 19 studies, 11 (58%) showed significant inverse relationships between soy food or protein intake and risk of breast cancer [44-46,61,64,71-73,77,78,81].”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Dietary fat and the risk of breast cancer.
Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Rosner, B. A., Hennekens, C. H., & Speizer, F. E. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198701013160105 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Chowdhury, R., Sinha, B., Sankar, M. J., Taneja, S., Bhandari, N., Rollins, N., Bahl, R., & Martines, J. (2015) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.13102 · Cited by 1,143 · see citing works
Oestrogen exposure and breast cancer risk
Travis, R. C., & Key, T. J. (2003) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr628 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Soya foods and breast cancer risk: A prospective study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan
Key, T. J., Sharp, G. B., Appleby, P. N., Beral, V, Goodman, M. T., Soda, M., & Mabuchi, K. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690837 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fritz, H., Seely, D., Flower, G., Skidmore, B., Fernandes, R., Vadeboncoeur, S., Kennedy, D., Cooley, K., Wong, R., Sagar, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081968 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Patisaul, H., & Whitten, P. (2004) · Endocrine Disruptors · doi:10.1201/9781420038866.ch5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, H. P., Gourley, L., Duffy, S. W., Est�ve, J., Lee, J., & Day, N. E.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Venue
- Cancer Causes and Control
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-322
- ISSN
- 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7225
- OpenAlex
- W2007303998
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Keywords
- breast cancer risk factors, menopausal status, age at first birth, nulliparity, tall stature, educational attainment, family history of breast cancer, dietary intake, polyunsaturated fatty acids, beta-carotene, soy protein, red meat consumption, hormonal mechanisms
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Menopause, Middle Aged, Parity, Risk Factors, Singapore, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review