The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New developments in LISREL: analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient
Olsson, U. (1979) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296207 · Cited by 1,127
Cited by
Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research
Golob, T. F. (2003) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(01)00046-7 · Cited by 1,043
Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions.
Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.58 · Cited by 910
Motivation and dropout in female handballers: a 21-month prospective study
Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R., Guillet, E., Pelletier, L., & Cury, F. (2002) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.98 · Cited by 616
Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use
Johnson, K. W. (1999) · Journal of Social Service Research · doi:10.1300/j079v24n03_06 · Cited by 592
Attitudes towards organic foods and risk/benefit perception associated with pesticides
Saba, A., & Messina, F. (2003) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00188-x · Cited by 438
Peters, L., Sunderland, M., Andrews, G., Rapee, R. M., & Mattick, R. P. (2012) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0024544 · Cited by 379
Modeling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items
Billiet, J. B., & McClendon, M. J. (2000) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0704_5 · Cited by 351
Assessing psychological change in adulthood: An overview of methodological issues
Hertzog, C., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.639 · Cited by 286
The Impact of Categorization With Confirmatory Factor Analysis
DiStefano, C. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0903_2 · Cited by 276
Generalized Latent Trait Models
Moustaki, I., & Knott, M. (2000) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296153 · Cited by 254
Does Beck's Hopelessness Scale really measure several components?
AISH, A.-M., & WASSERMAN, D. (2001) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291701003300 · Cited by 148
Individual response spread in self-report scales: personality correlations and consequences
Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., Gibson, G. J., McGregor, M. J., & Dent, J. B. (1998) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00175-x · Cited by 138
Sawatzky, R., Ratner, P. A., Johnson, J. L., Kopec, J. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-17 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- J�reskog, K. G.
- Venue
- Quality and Quantity
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-404
- ISSN
- 0033-5177 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7845
- OpenAlex
- W1577223643
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
