CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 998Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Memory related motor planning activity in posterior parietal cortex of macaque

Gnadt, J. W., Andersen, R. A.·1988·Experimental Brain Research
DOI 10.1007/bf00271862
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unit recording studies in the lateral bank of the intraparietal cortex (area LIP) have demonstrated a response property not previously reported in posterior cortex. Studies were performed in the Rhesus monkey during tasks which required saccadic eye movements to remembered target locations in the dark. Neurons were found which remained active during the time period for which the monkey had to withhold eye movements while remembering desired target locations. The activity of the cells was tuned for eye movements of specific direction and amplitude, and it was not necessary for a visual stimulus to fall within the response field. The responses appeared to represent a memory-related motor-planning signal encoding motor error. The relation of the activity to the behavior of the animal suggests that the response represents the intent to make eye movements of specific direction and amplitude.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00271862

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gnadt JW, Andersen RA, Blatt GJ (1986) Spatial, memory, and motor-planning properties of saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) of macaque. Soc Neurosci Abstr 12: 454

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 998

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gnadt, J. W., & Andersen, R. A.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
ORCID
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1988-03
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
216-220
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
DOI
10.1007/bf00271862
OpenAlex
W1569395231
Cited by
998
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 29
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (EY 05522)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-081087)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
posterior parietal cortex, intraparietal sulcus, saccades, rhesus monkeys, single-unit recording, visual working memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrophysiology, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Motor Activity, Motor Skills, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Rats, Inbred Strains, Saccades, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review