Cited by 1,103Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integration

Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex

Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., Andersen, R. A.·1997·Nature

Abstract

To look at or reach for what we see, spatial information from the visual system must be transformed into a motor plan. The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is well placed to perform this function, because it lies between visual areas, which encode spatial information, and motor cortical areas. The PPC contains several subdivisions, which are generally conceived as high-order sensory areas. Neurons in area 7a and the lateral intraparietal area fire before and during visually guided saccades. Other neurons in areas 7a and 5 are active before and during visually guided arm movements. These areas are also active during memory tasks in which the animal remembers the location of a target for hundreds of milliseconds before making an eye or arm movement. Such activity could reflect either visual attention or the intention to make movements. This question is difficult to resolve, because even if the animal maintains fixation while directing attention to a peripheral location, the observed neuronal activity could reflect movements that are planned but not executed. To address this, we recorded from the PPC while monkeys planned either reaches or saccades to a single remembered location. We now report that, for most neurons, activity before the movement depended on the type of movement being planned. We conclude that PPC contains signals related to what the animal intends to do.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/386167a0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parietal cortex activity preceded both execution and imagery responses, consistent with motor intention research.

    “Our results demonstrate that neural activity in parietal cortex was observed prior to both execution and imagery responses, which is in agreement with motor intention studies (Snyder et al., 1997; Quiroga, 2006; Desmurget et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1997-03
Volume
386
Issue
6621
Pages
167-170
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2016527110
Cited by
1,103
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 39
FWCI
27.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
posterior parietal cortex, movement intention, visually guided saccades, area 7a, lateral intraparietal area, area 5, visual attention, spatial memory, motor planning, single-unit recording, monkeys
MeSH terms
Animals, Arm, Attention, Cues, Macaca, Motivation, Motor Activity, Motor Neurons, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Saccades

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review