Cited by 546Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural Networks and Applications

Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons

Sejnowski, T. J.·1977·Journal of Mathematical Biology

Abstract

A time-dependent, nonlinear model of neuronal interaction which was probabilistically analyzed in a previous article is shown here to be a natural generalization of the Hartline-Ratliff model of the Limulus retina. Although the primary physical variables in the model are the membrane potentials of neurons, the equations which govern the means and covariances of the membrane potentials are coupled through the average firing rates; as a consequence, the average firing rates control the selective storage and retrieval of covariance information. Motor learning in the cerebellar cortex is treated as a problem of covariance storage, and a predicition is made for the underlying synaptic plasticity: the change in synaptic strength between a parallel fiber and a Purkinje cell should be proportional to the covariance between discharges in the parallel fiber and the climbing fiber. Unlike previous proposals for synaptic plasticity, this prediction requires both facilitation and depression to occur (under different conditions) at the same synapse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00275079

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Eccles, J. C., Ito, M., Szentágothai, J.: The cerebellum as a neuronal machine. Berlin-HeidelbergNew York: Springer 1967.
  2. Jeffress, L. A.: Localization of sound. In: Handbook of sensory physiology V/2: Auditory system (Keidel, W. D., Neff, W. D., eds.). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1975.
  3. Ito, M.: Learning control mechanisms by the cerebellum flocculo-vestibulo-ocular system. In: The nervous system, Vol. 1 (Tower, D. H., ed.). New York: Raven Press 1975.
  4. Julesz, B.: Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1971.
  5. Kalman, R. E., Falb, P. L., Arbib, M. A.: Topics in mathematical system theory. New York: McGraw-Hill 1969.
  6. Mountcastle, V. B.: The problem of sensing and neural coding. In: The neurosciences: a study program (Quarton, G. C., Melnechuk, T., Schmitt, F. O., eds.). New York: The Rockefeller University Press 1967.
  7. Palay, S. L., Chan-Palay, W.: Cerebellar cortex: cytology and organization. Berlin-HeidelbergNew York: Springer 1974.
  8. Ratliff, F.: Studies in excitation and inhibition in the retina. New York: The Rockefeller University Press 1974.
  9. Robinson, D. A.: Adaptive gain control of vestibulo-ocular reflex by the cerebellum. J. Neurophysiol. 39, 954969 (1976).
  10. Sejnowski, T. J.: Statistical constraints on synaptic plasticity. J. Theor. Bio., in press (1977).
  11. Snyder, D. L.: Random point processes. New York: Wiley 1975.
  12. Stent, G. S.: A physiological mechanism for Hebb's postulate of learning. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70,997—1001 (1973).
  13. Stevens, C. F.: Neurophysiology: A primer. New York: J. Wiley 1966.
  14. Stevens, J. K., Gerstein, G. L.: Interactions between cat lateral geniculate neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 39, 239256 (1976).
  15. Szentágothai, J.: Architecture of the cerebral cortex. In: Basic mechanisms of the epilepsies (Jasper, H. H., Ward, A. A., Pope, A., eds.). Boston: Little, Brown 1969.
  16. Tsypkin, Ya. Z.: Foundations of the theory of learning systems. New York: Academic Press 1973.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sejnowski, T. J.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Biology
Published
1977
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
303-321
ISSN
  • 0303-6812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1416
OpenAlex
W2125001634
Cited by
546
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mathematical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
membrane potential, firing rate, cerebellar motor learning, synaptic plasticity, parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapse, climbing fibers
MeSH terms
Cerebellum, Information Theory, Learning, Membrane Potentials, Memory, Models, Neurological, Motor Activity, Neurons, Probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review