The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Paivio, A. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315798868 · Cited by 4,184
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674433014 · Cited by 3,447
Mezei, Á., & Paivio, A. (1972) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1572599 · Cited by 3,265
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203780954 · Cited by 2,180
The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and The Laws of Physics
Penrose, R., & Gardner, M. (1989) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001 · Cited by 2,007
The Child's Conception of Number
Peel, E. A., & Piaget, J. (1953) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3118763 · Cited by 1,753
Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding
Skemp, R. R. (1978) · The Arithmetic Teacher · doi:10.5951/at.26.3.0009 · Cited by 1,316
Piaget, J. (1970) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/piag91272 · Cited by 1,115
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Brownell, W. A.: 1935, ?Psychological considerations in learning and teaching arithmetic?, in The Teaching of Arithmetic: Tenth Yearbook of the NCTM, Columbia University Press, New York.
- Clements, K.: 1981, ?Visual imagery and school mathematics?, For the Learning of Mathematics 2(2), 33?38.
- Dörfler, W.: 1987, ?Empirical investigation of the construction of cognitive schemata from actions?, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of PME, Vol. III, pp. 3?9.
- Dörfler, W.: 1989, ?Protocols of actions as a cognitive tool for knowledge construction?, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference of PME, Paris, Vol. 1, pp. 212?9.
- Eisenberg, T. and Dreyfus, T. (eds.): 1989, Visualization in the mathematics curriculum, Special issue of Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 11(1&2).
- Kaput, J. J.: 1979, ?Mathematics and learning: Roots of epistemological status?, in Lochhead, J. and Clement, J. (eds.), Cognitive Process Instruction, Franklin Institute Press.
- Otte, M.: 1984, ?Komplementarität?, Dialektik 8, 60?75.
- Poincaré, H.: 1952, Science and Method, Dover Publications, New York.
- Sfard, A.: 1987, ?Two conceptions of mathematical notions: operational and structural?, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of PME, Montreal, Vol. 3, pp. 162?9.
- Sfard, A.: 1988, ?Operational vs structural method of teaching mathematics: A case study?, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of PME, Hungary, pp. 560?7.
- Sfard, A.: 1989, ?Transition from operational to structural conception: the notion of function revisited?, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference of PME, Paris, Vol. 3, pp. 151?8.
- Sinclair, H. and Sinclair, A.: 1986, ?Children's mastery of written numerals and the construction of basic number concepts?, in Hiebert, J. (ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
- Thompson, P. W.: 1985, ?Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics: considerations in developing mathematical curricula?, in E. A.Silver (ed.), Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458 · Cited by 1,869
Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development
Cobb, P. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023007013 · Cited by 1,196
“Here, the notion of reflective abstraction is used to account for the process by which actions are reified and become mental mathematical objects that can themselves be acted upon (cf. Sfard, 1991; Thompson, 1994).”
MethodThe functions of multiple representations
Ainsworth, S. E. (1999) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00029-9 · Cited by 1,130
“Similarly, Sfard (1991) describes reified understanding as what results when a mathematical entity perceived as a process at one level is reconceived as an object at a higher level.”
BackgroundConstructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research
Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265 · Cited by 854
Duality, Ambiguity, and Flexibility: A "Proceptual" View of Simple Arithmetic
Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749505 · Cited by 805
Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing
Sfard, A. (2008) · Cited by 801
Self-citationThe Learning and Teaching of School Algebra
Kieran, C. (2006) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-874-620251021 · Cited by 606
A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning
Lithner, J. (2007) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2 · Cited by 665
Context Problems in Realistic Mathematics Education: A Calculus Course as an Example
Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Doorman, M. (1999) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/a:1003749919816 · Cited by 500
Kirshner, D. H., & Whitson, J. A. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003064121 · Cited by 459
How Students Understand Physics Equations
Sherin, B. L. (2001) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1904_3 · Cited by 457
“Some researchers have contrasted two broad stances that students adopt toward equations: the process stance and the object stance (Herscovics & Kieran, 1980; Kieran, 1992; Sfard, 1987, 1991).”
BackgroundHow Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1999) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_4 · Cited by 448
Reflective Discourse and Collective Reflection
Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. W. (1997) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.28.3.0258 · Cited by 416
Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2 · Cited by 441
“Consistent with the work of others (e.g., Dubinsky, 1991; Piaget, 1954; Pirie & Kieren, 1994; Sfard, 1991), our empirical work has led to distinctions among stages of conceptual learning.”
ResultEven, R. (1993) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.24.2.0094 · Cited by 417
“The evolution of the function concept is sometimes described as a move from a dynamic-dependency notion to a static-set-theoretic one (Freudenthal, 1983), or from an operational notion as a process to a structural notion as an object (Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundThe Gains and the Pitfalls of Reification — The Case of Algebra
Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2057-1_4 · Cited by 393
Self-citationImages of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus
Thompson, P. W. (1994) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf01273664 · Cited by 378
Situating Teachers’ Instructional Practices in the Institutional Setting of the School and District
Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T. D. S., & Dean, C. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032006013 · Cited by 378
Learning computer science concepts with Scratch
Meerbaum–Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben‐Ari, M. (2013) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2013.832022 · Cited by 360
Abstraction in Context: Epistemic Actions
Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749673 · Cited by 353
Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Gutiérrez, Á., & Boero, P. (2006) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789087901127 · Cited by 356
“…theoretical process-object distinctions that have been developed with respect to the construction of meaning in mathematics (e.g., Dubinsky, 1991; Sfard, 1991; Gray & Tall, 1994), as well as the recent models of abstraction (e.g., Hershkowitz, Schwarz & Dreyfus, 2001; Schwarz, Hershkowitz &…”
BackgroundLocal Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2004) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_3 · Cited by 338
“The transition from model-of to model-for coincides with a progression from informal to more formal mathematical reasoning that involves the creation of new mathematical reality, which is thought of as consisting of mathematical objects (Sfard, 1991) within a framework of mathematical relations.”
BackgroundThe gains and the pitfalls of reification — The case of algebra
Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf01273663 · Cited by 334
Self-citationSfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001) · Mind Culture and Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0801_04 · Cited by 299
“…was that although both the history of algebra and our own studies on its learning show the precedence of operational understanding over structural (Sfard, 1991; Kieran, 1992), “it is fairly possible that massive use of computer graphics will reverse [this developmental order] so that the…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe transition to formal thinking in mathematics
Tall, D. O. (2008) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/bf03217474 · Cited by 294
Rethinking Characterizations of Beliefs
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002) · Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? · doi:10.1007/0-306-47958-3_3 · Cited by 283
Design research in statistics education : on symbolizing and computer tools
Bakker, A. (2004) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 278
Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: a conceptual change approach
Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2004) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.013 · Cited by 268
“For example, the conceptualization of ratios of integers as numbers, rather than operations, can be accounted for as an ontological shift of ratios from the category of processes to the category of mathematical objects (Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundFactors involved in linking representations of functions
Even, R. (1998) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0732-3123(99)80063-7 · Cited by 256
Weber, K. (2004) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.03.001 · Cited by 260
“…have been many studies on individuals’ learning and understanding of advanced mathematical concepts (e.g., Davis and Vinner, 1986; Tall, 1991; Pinto and Tall, 1999) and other reports on the nature of the concepts themselves (e.g., Sfard, 1991; Lakoff and Nunez, 2000; Dubinsky and McDonald, 2001).”
BackgroundHow Humans Learn to Think Mathematically
Tall, D. O. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139565202 · Cited by 282
Enabling Teachers to be Real Teachers: Necessary Levels of Awareness and Structure of Attention
Mason, J. H. (1998) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1009973717476 · Cited by 241
“Tall, 1994), reification ( Sfard, 1991 ), and encapsulation (Piaget, 1977; Dubinsky & Levin, 1986) has both idiosyncratic aspects and more-orless shared aspects.”
BackgroundNemirovsky, R., Tierney, C. C., & Wright, T. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1602_1 · Cited by 238
“Others focused on the polarity between pointwise and shape-based understanding of graphs, a polarity that has been presented as an instance of the more general dialectic between process/ object which, according to several authors, underlies all mathematics learning (Dubinsky & Harel, 1992; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundA Framework for Research and Curriculum Development in Undergraduate Mathematics Educationjpeg
Asiala, Brown, A. H. F., DeViries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D. M., & Thomas, K. F. (2009) · Colección Digital Eudoxus · Cited by 226
Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370001003676603 · Cited by 225
“For instance, we expect that students will also have great difficulty conceptualizing natural and non-natural numbers as members of the same family (see also Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundSTUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF ALGEBRAIC NOTATION: 11–15
MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1997) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/a:1002970913563 · Cited by 223
The Case for Dynamic Models of Learners' Ontologies in Physics
Gupta, A. K., Hammer, D., & Redish, E. F. (2010) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.491751 · Cited by 215
“…by starting with objects (e.g., numbers), defining processes that manipulate and transform those objects (e.g., functions), and then recategorizing the processes as a new kind of object (e.g., vectors in a function space), creating new processes that act on these objects, and so on (Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundThe emergence of objects from mathematical practices
Font, V., Godino, J. D., & Romero, J. G. (2012) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9411-0 · Cited by 214
“The process of reification has also been studied in the area of mathematics education (see, for example, Asiala et al., 1996; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundAn Investigation of Teachers' Beliefs of Students' Algebra Development
Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1802_03 · Cited by 213
“In so doing, they appear to pass over some of the conceptual and structural underpinnings of symbolic forms of representation (e.g., Kieran, 1992; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundThe development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives
Sfard, A. (1995) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/0732-3123(95)90022-5 · Cited by 224
Self-citationModelling Mathematical Reasoning in Physics Education
Uhden, O., Karam, R., Pietrocola, M., & Pospiech, G. (2011) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9396-6 · Cited by 220
Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. (1998) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749790 · Cited by 225
Task Design In Mathematics Education
Kieran, C., Doorman, M., Ohtani, M., Watson, A., Ohtani, M., Education, M., & Education, S. M. (2015) · New ICMI studies series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2 · Cited by 224
Explicating a Mechanism for Conceptual Learning: Elaborating the Construct of Reflective Abstraction
Simon, M. A., Tzur, R., Heinz, K., et al. (2004) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/30034818 · Cited by 203
“The first are descriptions of stages of concept development (cf. Pirie & Kieren, 1994; Sfard, 1991), and the second are pedagogical theories that specify pedagogical situations or stages such as the French theory of didactical situations (Brousseau, 1997) and the Dutch Realistic Mathematics Education (Gravemeijer, 199…”
BackgroundInfluentialLearning the Algebraic Method of Solving Problems
Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (1999) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0732-3123(99)00026-7 · Cited by 208
On the Teaching of Linear Algebra
Dorier, J.-L. (2002) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47224-4 · Cited by 198
Learning About Statistical Covariation
Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2003) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2101_1 · Cited by 195
“11In Sfard’s (1991) terms, this student’s view of the median as he participated in these discussions”
BackgroundCharalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H., et al. (2010) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986060903460070 · Cited by 195
Teaching with Variation: A Chinese Way of Promoting Effective Mathematics Learning
Gu, L., HUNAG, R., & Marton, F. (2004) · Series on mathematical education · doi:10.1142/9789812562241_0012 · Cited by 190
Hammersley, M., Gomm, R., & Foster, P. (2009) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857024367.d17 · Cited by 187
Foundational Reasoning Abilities that Promote Coherence in Students' Function Understanding
Oehrtman, M., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008) · doi:10.5948/upo9780883859759.004 · Cited by 186
“With intentional instruction, however, students can develop a more robust process view of function (Carlson et al., submitted; Dubinsky, 1991; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundReducing Abstraction Level When Learning Abstract Algebra Concepts
Hazzan, O. (1999) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/a:1003780613628 · Cited by 186
Conceptual Knowledge in Introductory Calculus
White, P. J., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (1996) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749199 · Cited by 184
Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation
Falcade, R., Laborde, C., & Mariotti, M. A. (2007) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9072-y · Cited by 184
“It is interesting to note that some studies adopt a perspective that links historic, epistemological and cognitive analyses (Sfard 1991; Sierpinska 1992).”
BackgroundBorovcnik, M., & Peard, R. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_9 · Cited by 179
“Various authors, including Piaget (1972), Dubinsky (1991) and Sfard (1991), theorise that the growth of human knowledge starts with actions (first on the environment), some of which become repeatable processes and are later conceived as objects in their own right to be manipulated on a higher level…”
BackgroundTHINKING THROUGH THREE WORLDS OF MATHEMATICS
Tall, D. O. (2004) · Proceedings of the ... PME Conference · Cited by 173
Habitual control of goal selection in humans
Cushman, F. A., & Morris, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1506367112 · Cited by 172
Exploring teacher noticing of student algebraic thinking in a video club
Walkoe, J. D. K. (2014) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-014-9289-0 · Cited by 182
What Is the Object of the Encapsulation of a Process?
Tall, D. O., Thomas, M. O. J., Davis, G. E., Gray, E. M., & Simpson, A. P. (1999) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0732-3123(99)00029-2 · Cited by 159
“What is the role played by imagery?”
BackgroundMethods of Instructional Improvement in Algebra
Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M. B., & Ronau, R. N. (2010) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654310374880 · Cited by 156
“Sfard (1991) found that both students and teachers often expect immediate rewards for teaching and learning efforts.”
BackgroundGestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk
Edwards, L. D. (2008) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9124-6 · Cited by 153
“Although it cannot be pursued here, gesture analysis may shed further light on the pervasive metaphor in which numbers, procedures and other mathematical 134 L.D. Edwards “entities” are treated as “objects” by students and mathematicians alike (cf., Radford 2002; Sfard 1991).”
BackgroundDifficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P. H. M., & van den Heuvel‐Panhuizen, M. (2014) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0 · Cited by 204
Integrating Technology into Mathematics Education: Theoretical Perspectives
Drijvers, P. H. M., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M.-A., et al. (2009) · New ICMI studies series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_7 · Cited by 152
Hollebrands, K. F. (2003) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0732-3123(03)00004-x · Cited by 152
A Comparison of Programming Languages and Algebraic Notation as Expressive Languages for Physics
Sherin, B. L. (2001) · International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1011434026437 · Cited by 152
“…I have relied significantly on research into how students understand and solve elementary word problems (e.g., Carpenter and Moser, 1983; Fuson, 1992; Reed, 1998; Riley, Greeno and Heller, 1983) and understand mathematical equations (Kieran, 1992; Herscovics and Kieran, 1980; Sfard, 1987, 1991).”
BackgroundAlgebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: a semiotic perspective
Radford, L., Laurentienne, U., & Peirce, C. S. (2015) · Cited by 148
The balance model: Hindrance or support for the solving of linear equations with one unknown
Vlassis, J. (2002) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/a:1020229023965 · Cited by 143
“On the other hand, students assimilate only very gradu- ally the concepts implied by the properties of equality and by the acquisition of a ‘structural’ view of expressions (Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundBlack Boxes in Workplace Mathematics
Williams, J. S., & Wake, G. (2006) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9039-z · Cited by 149
The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry
Levav-Waynberg, A., & Лейкин, Р. (2011) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001 · Cited by 143
Pedagogical Content Tools: Integrating Student Reasoning and Mathematics in Instruction
Rasmussen, C. L., & Marrongelle, K. A. (2006) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/30034860 · Cited by 136
Aspects of the Nature and State of Research in Mathematics Education
Niss, M. (1999) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/a:1003715913784 · Cited by 144
The array representation and primary children’s understanding and reasoning in multiplication
Barmby, P., Harries, T., Higgins, S., et al. (2008) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9145-1 · Cited by 132
“Sfard (1991) highlighted the role that representations (in particular visual representations) play in the way we develop mathematical concepts as learners, moving from an operational or process view of a concept to a structural view (e.g.”
BackgroundKnowledge of Algebra for Teaching: A Framework of Knowledge and Practices
McCrory, R., Floden, R. E., Ferrini‐Mundy, J., Reckase, M. D., & Senk, S. L. (2012) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0584 · Cited by 141
“This item is advanced not because it is difficult but because it draws on the ability to see functions as algebraic objects in their own right, objects subject to rules governing operations on real numbers (cf. Dubinsky & McDonald, 2001; Kieran, 1992; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundZandieh, M., & Rasmussen, C. L. (2010) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.01.001 · Cited by 135
Understanding the integral: Students’ symbolic forms
Jones, S. R. (2013) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.004 · Cited by 137
Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf00163752 · Cited by 138
Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: Exploring the Gap Between Knowledge Type and Knowledge Quality
Star, J. R., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/14926156.2013.784828 · Cited by 129
“In fact, many mathematics educators (e.g., Gray & Tall, 1994; Sfard, 1991) have raised questions about whether conceptual and procedural knowledge are distinct types of knowledge at all.”
BackgroundNaturally occurring data as research instrument
Lister, R., Clear, T., Simon, Bouvier, D. J., Carter, P., Eckerdal, A., Jacková, J., Lopez, M., McCartney, R., Robbins, P., et al. (2010) · ACM SIGCSE Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1709424.1709460 · Cited by 127
“It has also been observed [29] that these cycles are related both internally and sequentially: the desire to use a concept as a concrete object may drive the development of the earlier stages, and the need for a particular primitive in a concept may drive the reification in a previous concept.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEpistemologies of Mathematics and of Mathematics Education
Sierpinska, A., & Lerman, S. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_26 · Cited by 125
Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking
Tall, D. O., Gray, E. M., Ali, M. B., et al. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/14926150109556452 · Cited by 123
“The process of compression from process to concept has been described in similar ways by various authors (e.g. Sfard, 1991 ; Dubinsky, 1991).”
MethodHandheld technology for mathematics education: flashback into the future
Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. H. M. (2010) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0269-2 · Cited by 138
“This suggests that the use of HHT can promote object thinking and encapsulation of mathematical processes, which is seen as an important mathematical achievement (e.g. see Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundSfard, A. (2000) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749809 · Cited by 120
Self-citationProcedural embodiment and magic in linear equations
de Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. O. (2007) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-007-9086-0 · Cited by 119
“In this case, theories of process-object encapsulation (Dubinsky, 1991, Sfard, 1991, Gray & Tall, 1994) are not relevant to describe what the students are actually doing:”
MethodDevelopment of angle concepts by progressive abstraction and generalisation
Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. J. (2000) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/a:1003927811079 · Cited by 119
Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0372 · Cited by 132
“Researchers have examined learning about functions from multiple points of view, such as: 1) Identifying different ways of thinking about functions (Carlson, 1998; Confrey & Smith, 1995; Schoenfeld, Smith, & Arcavi, 1993; Sfard, 1991; Thompson, 1994a; Yerushalmy, 1997); 2) Documenting errors and misconceptions about f…”
BackgroundDoorman, M., Drijvers, P. H. M., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., Boon, P., & Reed, H. C. (2012) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9329-0 · Cited by 129
“In summary, we conclude that the learning arrangement with a computer tool helped students to overcome the difficulty of integrating operational and structural aspects of the concept function (Falcade et al., 2007; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialLayers of generality and types of generalization in pattern activities
Radford, L. (2010) · PNA · doi:10.30827/pna.v4i2.6169 · Cited by 115
“A bit later Sfard (1991) and Gray and Tall (1994) called attention to the students’ difficulties in distinguishing between objects and processes, while Bednarz and Janvier”
BackgroundHow humans learn to think mathematically: exploring the three worlds of mathematics
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5072 · Cited by 114
Nemirovsky, R., Rasmussen, C. L., Sweeney, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.611445 · Cited by 114
“Historically speaking, viewing a complex number as single entity, in part via the complex plane, represents a significant conceptual advance (Penrose, 2004; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundDooren, W. V., Verschaffel, L., & Onghena, P. (2002) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/4149957 · Cited by 120
“") For this scoring, we used an a priori classification scheme based on the work of several other researchers (Filloy & Sutherland, 1996; Hall et al., 1989; Kieran, 1992; Linchevski & Herscovics, 1996; Reed, 1999; Sfard, 1991; Stacey & MacGregor, 2000; Wolters, 1976).”
BackgroundMethodHaspékian, M. (2005) · International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-005-0395-z · Cited by 114
“…the difficulties of algebraic learning have already been extensively investigated and often related to different analyses: procedural/ structural duality (Sfard, 1991), semantic/syntactic difficulty (Drouhard, 1992), arithmetic/algebra relationships (Vergnaud et al., 1988; Vergnaud, 1989/90).”
BackgroundGeneralising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking
Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-007-9092-2 · Cited by 159
diSessa, A. A. (2018) · ICME-13 monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_5 · Cited by 129
Hazzan, O. (2003) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1076/csed.13.2.95.14202 · Cited by 111
“(Sfard, 1991, p. 4).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAsking mathematical questions mathematically
Mason, J. H. (2000) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/002073900287426 · Cited by 119
Research on calculus: what do we know and where do we need to go?
Rasmussen, C. L., Marrongelle, K. A., & Borba, M. C. (2014) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0615-x · Cited by 127
Levels of students’ “conception” of fractions
Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. (2011) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9338-x · Cited by 105
“Researchers viewing that in the concept formation procedural/operational understanding precedes the conceptual/structural one, developed frameworks describing the process of concept formation (Dubinsky, 1991; Gray & Tall, 1994; Sfard, 1991).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKieran, C., Jeongsuk, P., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016) · ICME-13 topical surveys · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32258-2 · Cited by 191
Characterizing Practices Associated with Functions in Middle School Textbooks: An Empirical Approach
Mesa, V. (2004) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/b:educ.0000040409.63571.56 · Cited by 105
Complex calculators in the classroom: theoretical and practical reflections on teaching pre-calculus
Lagrange, J.-B. (1999) · International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1009858714113 · Cited by 103
“There is no permanent necessity to consider first an ‘operative’ (Sfard, 1991) approach of concepts.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sfard, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Sfard, Anna
- ORCID
- Sfard, Anna
- Venue
- Educational Studies in Mathematics
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0013-1954 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0816
- OpenAlex
- W2072267223
- Semantic Scholar
- 57d32a56079c7a2d6b9c89c668386a1e09441137
- Cited by
- 1,852
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 77.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Educational Studies in Mathematics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- structural conception, reification, interiorization, condensation, concept formation, mathematics learning, problem solving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review