Cited by 116Circadian rhythm and melatoninPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Die lunare und t�gliche Schl�pfperiodik der M�cke Clunio: Steuerung und Abstimmung auf die Gezeitenperiodik

Neumann, Dietrich·1966·Zeitschrift f�r Vergleichende Physiologie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00343045

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neumann, D.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Neumann, Dietrich
Venue
Zeitschrift f�r Vergleichende Physiologie
Published
1966
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
1-61
ISSN
  • 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1351
OpenAlex
W2913335677
Cited by
116
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
Clunio, cicadas, cicada emergence, lunar periodicity, diurnal periodicity, emergence rhythm, insect chronobiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review