Cited by 405Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeological and Geological Studies

Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record

Lam, Y. M., Chen, Xingbin, Pearson, O. M.·1999·American Antiquity

Abstract

Intertaxonomic differences in skeletal element representation in archaeological faunas may reflect preferences in the procurement, processing, transport, and/or consumption of these species by prehistoric foragers. However, the possibility that they also may result from preservational bias must be addressed before behavioral attributes of human hunters may be inferred. For example, at many archaeological sites, the remains of equids exhibit a different pattern of skeletal element representation than those of bovids and cervids. To evaluate the significance of such differences, this study examines intertaxonomic variability in patterns of bone density, the attribute most commonly employed as a proxy measure of resistance to destructive processes. Density data derived for a bovid (Connachaetes taurinus), a cervid (Rangifer tarandus), and two species of equid (Equus burchelli and E. przewalskii) exhibited very similar patterns, suggesting that values for one species may be used to interpret the survival patterns for other species of generally similar morphology. The differences in skeletal element representation between bovid, cervid, and equid species observed in archaeological faunas do not correspond with bone density and thus likely indicate selective treatment by human or other biotic agents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2694283

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lam, Y. M., Chen, X., & Pearson, O. M.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
1999-04
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
343-362
ISSN
  • 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-5064
OpenAlex
W2329768911
Cited by
405
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
bone mineral density, preservational bias, Bovidae, deer, Equidae, reindeer, Equus przewalskii, Equus burchelli, zooarchaeology, faunal remains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review