Cited by 18Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disorders

Reproducibility of glycaemic thresholds for activation of counterregulatory hormones and hypoglycaemic symptoms in healthy subjects

Open access
Vea, H., Jorde, R., Sager, G., Vaaler, S., Sundsfjord, J.·1992·Diabetologia

Abstract

Nine healthy subjects were studied on two separate occasions, at least two weeks apart, using the glucose clamp technique to produce a gradual hypoglycaemia. Glucose thresholds for neuroendocrine and symptom responses varied up to 1.5 mmol/l between subjects. There was a significant correlation between individual glucose thresholds on day 1 and 2 for adrenaline (p = 0.0008), growth hormone (p = 0.007) and pancreatic polypeptide (p = 0.02), and for autonomic (p = 0.018) and neuroglycopoenic (p = 0.023) symptoms, whereas no significant correlations were found for glucagon and cortisol. The mean intra-individual differences in glucose thresholds between day 1 and 2 were 0.22 mmol/l for the hormones and 0.25 mmol/l for the symptoms. We conclude that healthy subjects differ in hypoglycaemic thresholds, and that the difference reflects individual variation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00401425

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies using a graded stepped hypoglycaemic clamp reported similar results.

    “two studies using a graded stepped hypoglycaemic clamp reported similar results [18, 19].”

    From Glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses to hypoglycaemia in people with and without type 1 diabetes: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Abstract and Discussion report reproducible hypoglycaemic thresholds and say the thresholds were similar to those reported by others. But Subjects and methods describes a gradual fall in glucose over 240 minutes, not a graded stepped clamp. The claim's description of this study's method is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two studies dating back to the 1990s that used a gradual glucose-lowering method to assess glycaemic thresholds in children with type 1 diabetes reported results in line with the systematic review's findings.

    “Nevertheless, two studies dating back to the 1990s that used such a gradual glucose-lowering method to assess glycaemic thresholds in children with type 1 diabetes reported results that were in line with our findings [17, 18].”

    From Glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses to hypoglycaemia in people with and without type 1 diabetes: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Subjects and methods section describes a gradual glucose-lowering study of glycaemic thresholds, but its participants were nine healthy subjects tested on two occasions—not children with type 1 diabetes. The paper therefore supports the method attributed to it, but not the claimed study population. Whether its results align with the citing review cannot be determined from this source alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A total of 25 studies (40%) provided data to either calculate or extract the glycaemic threshold for symptom responses to hypoglycaemia.

    “A total of 25 studies (40%) provided data to either calculate or extract the glycaemic threshold for symptom responses to hypoglycaemia [6, 13, 16–18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 29, 31, 33–37, 46, 51–53, 56, 57, 58, 63, 68].”
  • The authors of the clamp reproducibility study concluded that the method produced reproducible results.

    “indeed, the authors concluded that the method gave reproducible results [16].”
  • Intraindividual differences in the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic and -hypoglycaemic clamp techniques are about 0.2 mmol/l (4 mg/dl).

    “intraindividual differences of approximately 0.2 mmol/l (4 mg/dl) [16]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vea, H., Jorde, R., Sager, G., Vaaler, S., & Sundsfjord, J.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1992-10
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
958-961
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2067400762
Cited by
18
References
14
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Diabetesforbundet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
hypoglycemia, counterregulatory hormones, epinephrine, growth hormone, pancreatic polypeptide, glucagon, cortisol, autonomic symptoms, interindividual variability, glucose clamp, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Glucose, Epinephrine, Female, Glucagon, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypoglycemia, Male, Pancreatic Polypeptide, Radioimmunoassay, Growth Hormone, Reproducibility of Results, Glucose Clamp Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review