Cited by 65Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide: Effect on glucose-induced insulin release from isolated rat pancreatic islets in vitro

Open access
Schauder, P., Brown, J. C., Frerichs, H., Creutzfeldt, W.·1975·Diabetologia

Abstract

Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP; 1 or 10 mug/ml) potentiated glucose-induced (8 or 16.6 mM) insulin (IRI) release from isolated rat pancreatic islets. Basal release was unaffected. The threshold concentration of glucose necessary for GIP to modulate IRI release was between 6 and 8 mM. GIP had no effect on IRI release from islets submitted to a maximal glucose stimulus (25 mM).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00429919

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The incretin effect describes that orally, but not intravenously, administered glucose enhances insulin secretion by triggering GLP-1 and GIP secretion, and the resulting potentiation may account for up to 50% of total insulin release.

    “This effect describes the observation that orally, but not intravenously, administered glucose enhances insulin secretion by triggering GLP-1 and GIP secretion;73, 74, 75 the resulting potentiation of insulin secretion may account for up to 50% of the total release.”

    From Pancreatic regulation of glucose homeostasis. (2016) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Discussion reports that oral glucose produces a greater rise in serum insulin than intravenous glucose and identifies GIP as a possible contributor. The Results show that GIP potentiated glucose-induced insulin release from isolated rat islets, but the paper does not establish that oral glucose acts through both GIP and GLP-1. The 50% estimate follows the citation in the citing sentence and is not treated as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schauder, P., Brown, J. C., Frerichs, H., & Creutzfeldt, W.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1975-10
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
483-484
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1976973369
Cited by
65
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Fr 264/4)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, insulin secretion, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, pancreatic islets, incretins, glucose threshold, rats
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Animals, Gastrointestinal Hormones, Glucose, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Peptides, Stimulation, Chemical, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review