Cited by 40Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

How the Jones polynomial gives rise to physical states of quantum general relativity

Open access
Brügmann, Bernd, Gambini, Rodolfo, Pullin, Jorge·1993·General Relativity and Gravitation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00756923

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The scalar product defined in this way is precisely the one defined on the loop representation by the loop transform of the Ashtekar-Lewandowski measure, namely the conventional Haar measure lattice gauge theory scalar product for each graph.

    “We think that the scalar product defined in this way is precisely the one defined on the loop representation by the loop transform [3,4] of the Ashtekar-Lewandowski measure [53], namely the conventional Haar measure lattice gauge theory scalar product for each graph.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3][3] C. Di Bartolo, R. Gambini, J. Griego, L. Leal, Preprint IFFI (1991) (Montevideo). -
  2. [7][7] B. Br¨ ugmann, J. Pullin, Syracuse University Preprint SU-GP-91/8-5 (1991). -
  3. [12][12] A. Ashtekar, C. Rovelli, Syracuse University Preprint (1991). -
  4. [16][16] R. A. Farrerons, Ph. D. Thesis, Universitat Aut` onoma de Barcelona (1990). -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brügmann, B., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
General Relativity and Gravitation
Published
1993-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0001-7701 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9532
OpenAlex
W2075198574
Cited by
40
References
16
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General Relativity and Gravitation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Syracuse University
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Jones polynomial, quantum gravity, loop representation, Ashtekar variables, diffeomorphism constraint, Hamiltonian constraint, knot invariants, knot theory, solution space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review