Knot Theory and Quantum Gravity
Abstract
A new representation for quantum general relativity is described, which is defined in terms of functionals of sets of loops in three-space. In this representation exact solutions of the quantum constraints may be obtained. This result is related to the simplification of the constraints in Ashtekar's new formalism. We give in closed form the general solution of the diffeomorphism constraints and a large class of solutions of the full set of constraints. These are classified by the knot and link classes of the spatial three-manifold.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Hamiltonian H is background independent.
“is nevertheless diffeomorphism invariant, background independent and (as we have argued elsewhere [3, 4, 12, 13] is implied by these conditions) finite.”
From The physical Hamiltonian in nonperturbative quantum gravity (1994) · cites this paper as [13]
Replacing G with the quantum group G_q at q=1 a root of unity, which has a finite set of inequivalent irreducible representations, and colouring spin foams with G_q representations and intertwiners while replacing A by its natural generalization yields a finite sum.
“This can be accomplished by replacing G with the quantum group G q with q = 1 a root of unity, which has a finite set of inequivalent irreducible representations. The spin foams are coloured with the representations and intertwiners of G q , and A is replaced by its natural generalization to such representations [16][18] yielding a finite sum.”
From Spacetime as a Feynman diagram: the connection formulation (2001) · cites this paper as [16]
The spectrum of geometrical operators in the coherent-state formulation turns out to be quite different from the standard one of loop quantum gravity.
“Furthermore, the spectrum of the geometrical operators in this formulation turns out to be quite different from the standard one of loop quantum gravity [14].”
From LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter (2008) · cites this paper as [14]
The Barrett-Crane vertex W(j) is a function of the ten spins alone.
“where W ( j ) is the Barrett-Crane vertex, which a functions of the ten spins alone.”
From Complete LQG propagator: Difficulties with the Barrett-Crane vertex (2007) · cites this paper as [4]
The transition amplitude matching between coherent states includes a phase factor exactly balancing those phases, as in the free propagator of a non-relativistic quantum particle and in the calculation illustrated in [4, 5].
“This is the case for instance for the free propagator of a non-relativistic quantum particles, as well as for the phases associated to the angles between tetrahedra in the calculation illustrated in [4, 5].”
From Complete LQG propagator: Difficulties with the Barrett-Crane vertex (2007) · cites this paper as [4]
There is a structural difficulty with the definition (64) of the amplitude.
“Second, as already mentioned, there is in fact a structural difficulty, already pointed out in [4, 5], with the definition (64) of the amplitude, and we think that this difficulty is at the roots of the problem.”
From Complete LQG propagator: Difficulties with the Barrett-Crane vertex (2007) · cites this paper as [4]
In loop quantum gravity, space geometry has no fixed structural property at all.
“Space geometry, indeed, has no fixed structural property at all in this approach.”
From Reconcile Planck-scale discreteness and the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
The apparent conflict between Lorentz contraction and Planck scale discreteness is resolved in loop quantum gravity.
“Here, we show how the apparent conflict between Lorentz contraction and Planck scale discreteness is resolved in loop quantum gravity [3]”
From Reconcile Planck-scale discreteness and the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
In loop quantum gravity, the geometry of space comes from a quantum field, the quantum gravitational field.
“The geometry of space comes from a quantum field, the quantum gravitational field.”
From Reconcile Planck-scale discreteness and the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
The kinematics of loop quantum gravity is rather well understood, while its dynamics is not understood as cleanly.
“While the kinematics of loop quantum gravity (LQG) [1] is rather well understood [2, 3], its dynamics is not understood as cleanly.”
From Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity (2008) · cites this paper as [1]
A spin foam picture emerges from considering the time evolution of spin networks.
“A spin foam picture emerges when considering the evolution in time of spin networks [16,17], which were discovered to represent states of quantum general relativity at the kinematical level [18][19][20][21][22], from the canonical side.”
From Spacetime geometry from algebra: spin foam models for non-perturbative quantum gravity (2001) · cites this paper as [16]
In canonical quantum gravity, the matrix elements of the proper-time evolution operator between spin network states are transition amplitudes, and computing them is equivalent to solving the theory by imposing the Hamiltonian and diffeomorphism constraints.
“Now we want to calculate the matrix elements of this operator between two spin network states (two s-knots).These are to be interpreted as transition amplitudes between quantum states of the gravitational field, and computing them is equivalent to having solved the theory imposing both the Hamiltonian and diffeomorphism constraints.”
From Spacetime geometry from algebra: spin foam models for non-perturbative quantum gravity (2001) · cites this paper as [16]
To first order, the computation produces a 4d version of the 'nutshell' 3d model studied in [6].
“To this order, the computation produces a 4d version of the 'nutshell' 3d model studied in [6].”
From Graviton Propagator from Background-Independent Quantum Gravity (2006) · cites this paper as [6]
It was shown in [15] that one can derive the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula Entropy = const × A from loop quantum gravity, with a constant const that is finite but has an incorrect value.
“It was shown in [15] that one can derive the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula Entropy = const × A from loop quantum gravity - with a constant const that turns out to be finite, but with an incorrect value.”
From Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity (1998) · cites this paper as [15]
The loop approach to quantum general relativity seems to be leading to a realization of a combinatorial space-time, deriving it solely from a strict application of conventional quantum ideas to standard general relativity.
“The loop approach to quantum general relativity [2,3] seems to be leading precisely to a realization of such a vision of a combinatorial space-time, deriving it solely from a strict application of conventional quantum ideas to standard general relativity.”
From Geometry eigenvalues and the scalar product from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity (1996) · cites this paper as [2]
The expectation value of the volume operator in GFT is given by the sum over spin representations of V_j ρ_j^2, as constructed from the first-quantized counterpart in LQG.
“Since the volume operator is diagonal in the basis of spin representations, one has for its expectation value”
From Cosmological implications of interacting group field theory models: Cyclic universe and accelerated expansion (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system
Witten, E. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5 · Cited by 2,562 · see citing works
Background independent quantum gravity: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/r01 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-q · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
Self-citationQUANTUM GRAVITY AND MINIMUM LENGTH
GARAY, L. J. (1995) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x95000085 · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Loop space representation of quantum general relativity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1990) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90019-a · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Self-citationSpin networks and quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.5743 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Self-citationLQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter
Engle, J., Livine, E., Pereira, R., & Rovelli, C. (2008) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.02.018 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.442 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Self-citationLoop-Quantum-Gravity Vertex Amplitude
Engle, J., Pereira, R., & Rovelli, C. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.161301 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Quantum gravity and Regge calculus
Immirzi, G. (1997) · Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements · doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(97)00354-x · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Linking topological quantum field theory and nonperturbative quantum gravity
Smolin, L. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531251 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Self-citationThe physical Hamiltonian in nonperturbative quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.446 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationSpacetime as a Feynman diagram: the connection formulation
Reisenberger, M. P., & Rovelli, C. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/1/308 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationGeometry eigenvalues and the scalar product from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity
De Pietri, R., & Rovelli, C. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.2664 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationComplete LQG propagator: Difficulties with the Barrett-Crane vertex
Alesci, E., & Rovelli, C. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.104012 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“It acts as a “double grasping” [3] operator that inserts a virtual link (in the spin-one representation) at the node, connecting the links labelled ni and nj.”
BackgroundInfluentialBasis of the Ponzano-Regge-Turaev-Viro-Ooguri quantum-gravity model is the loop representation basis
Rovelli, C. (1993) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.2702 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationReconcile Planck-scale discreteness and the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction
Rovelli, C., & Speziale, S. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.064019 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationCausal evolution of spin networks
Markopoulou, F., & Smolin, L. (1997) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)80019-3 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citation<i>SO</i> (4, <i>C</i> )-covariant Ashtekar-Barbero gravity and the Immirzi parameter
Alexandrov, S. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/307 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Clock and category: Is quantum gravity algebraic?
Crane, L. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531240 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Jones polynomials for intersecting knots as physical states of quantum gravity
Brügmann, B., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. (1992) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90060-o · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Projector on physical states in loop quantum gravity
Rovelli, C. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.104015 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Knot invariants as nondegenerate quantum geometries
Brügmann, B., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.431 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Quantum geometry with intrinsic local causality
Markopoulou, F., & Smolin, L. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.084032 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationA left-handed simplicial action for Euclidean general relativity
Reisenberger, M. P. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/012 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
de Cesare, M., Pithis, A. G. A., & Sakellariadou, M. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.064051 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Area spectrum in Lorentz covariant loop gravity
Alexandrov, S., & Vassilevich, D. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.044023 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Perturbative Finiteness in Spin-Foam Quantum Gravity
Crane, L., Perez, A., & Rovelli, C. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.181301 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Morales-Técotl, H. A., & Rovelli, C. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3642 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationBF gravity and the Immirzi parameter
Capovilla, R., Montesinos, M., Prieto, V. A., & Rojas, E. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/5/101 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The Hamiltonian constraint in quantum gravity
Blencowe, M. P. (1990) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90269-j · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The physical boundary Hilbert space and volume operator in the Lorentzian new spin-foam theory
Ding, Y., & Rovelli, C. (2010) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/20/205003 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A definition of the Ponzano–Regge quantum gravity model in terms of surfacesa)
Iwasaki, J. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531245 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
How the Jones polynomial gives rise to physical states of quantum general relativity
Brügmann, B., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. (1993) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/bf00756923 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
On the constraints of quantum gravity in the loop representation
Brügmann, B., & Pullin, J. (1993) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90462-x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
New constraints for canonical general relativity
Reisenberger, M. P. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00448-3 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Eleven-dimensional supergravity as a constrained topological field theory
Ling, Y., & Smolin, L. (2001) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00063-3 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationThe volume operator in covariant quantum gravity
Ding, Y., & Rovelli, C. (2010) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/16/165003 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Hermitian operators on quantum general relativity loop space
Rayner, D. (1990) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/7/4/018 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Guedes, T. L. M., Mena Marugán, G. A., Müller, M., & Vidotto, F. (2025) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/hjdk-kdhk · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT)
- ORCID
- Smolin, Lee
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1988-09-05
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1155-1158
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987751701
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Keywords
- quantum general relativity, knot theory, loop representation, Ashtekar variables, quantum constraints, diffeomorphism constraint, exact solutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review