The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment
Abstract
The research integrates the citizen participation literature with research on perceived control in an effort to further our understanding of psychological empowerment. Eleven indices of empowerment representing personality, cognitive, and motivational measures were identified to represent the construct. Three studies examined the relationship between empowerment and participation. The first study examined differences among groups identified by a laboratory manipulation as willing to participate in personally relevant or community relevant situations. Study II examined differences for groups defined by actual involvement in community activities and organizations. Study III replicated Study II with a different population. In each study, individuals reporting a greater amount of participation scored higher on indices of empowerment. Psychological empowerment could be described as the connection between a sense of personal competence, a desire for, and a willingness to take action in the public domain. Discriminant function analyses resulted in one significant dimension, identified as pyschological empowerment, that was positively correlated with leadership and negatively correlated with alienation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136676 · Cited by 6,289
Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040934 · Cited by 5,681
The measurement of generalized self-efficacy: a study of construct validity
(1984) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4805_14 · Cited by 278
Cited by
Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02506983 · Cited by 2,317
Self-citationSocial Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (1999) · Asian Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/1467-839x.00024 · Cited by 2,050
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000) · Handbook of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2 · Cited by 1,653
Self-citationA consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services
(1997) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.48.8.1042 · Cited by 854
Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019819402100203 · Cited by 788
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 725-750
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W2087062399
- Cited by
- 1,262
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00930023
- The paper
- Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00930023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.