The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research
Abstract
Scholars have acknowledged the need to anchor scientific knowledge about social and psychological processes in the norms, values, and experiences of the partticular population under study. This article describes how focus groups can be incorporated into the planning stages of a research pogram to facilitate these goals. After a brief overview of teh central components of focus group research, and example from a program of research involving dual‐earner African American families is used to as an illustration. The article describes how (a) the identification of cultural knowledge and (b)access to the language participants use to think and talk about a topic can help researchers formulate a conceptual framework, identify important constructs, and develop appropriate instruments for assessing constructs. Some strengths and limitations of focus group research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1177/002188638001600202 · DOI
- 10.1177/109019818701400404 · DOI · Paper page
- Blalock H. M., 1982, Concephialization and measurement in the social sciences
- Boykin A. W., 1979, Research directions of Black psychologists, 85
- 10.1086/448619 · DOI · Paper page
- Crosby F. J., 1987, Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles
- Davis G., 1982, Black life in Corporate America
- 10.1177/109019819201900107 · DOI
- 10.1177/109019819201900106 · DOI
- Hecht M. L., 1993, African American communication: Ethnic identity and cultural interpretation
- 10.1037/0003-066X.46.3.187 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.3.187 · Paper page
- Howard A., 1981, Handbook of cross-cultural human development, 113
- 10.1177/109019819201900105 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022189203004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.39.11.1297 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781483349008.n3 · DOI · Paper page
- Kohn M. L., 1969, Class and conformity
- 10.2307/2094334 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/226739 · DOI · Paper page
- Krippendorf K., 1980, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology
- Krueger R. A., 1988, Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research
- Kreckel M., 1981, Communicative acts and shared knowledge in natural discourse
- 10.2307/584828 · DOI
- 10.1080/10720538808412771 · DOI
- Marsella A. J., 1989, Measuring mental illness: Psychometric assessment for clinicians, 231
- McAdoo H. P., 1982, Black families
- Miles M. B., 1984, Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods
- Mohler P. P., 1984, TEXTPACK Version V. Release 2
- Morgan D. L., 1988, Focus groups as qualitative research
- 10.1093/geront/29.1.101 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781483349008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4135/9781483349008.n1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00987314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4135/9781483349008.n7 · DOI
- Piotrkowski C. S., 1979, Work and the family system: A naturalistic study of working-class and lower-middle-class families
- Plas J. M., 1986, Systems psychology in the schools
- Polanyi L., 1985, Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling
- Popko E. S., 1980, Key-word-in-context bibliographic indexing: Release 4.0 users manual
- 10.2307/352083 · DOI
- Quinn R. P., 1979, The 1977 quality of employment survey: Descriptive statistics with comparison data from 1969–70 and 1972–73 surveys
- Seidel J. V., 1988, The ethnograph: A user's guide
- Shweder R. A., 1984, Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion
- Stewart D. W., 1990, Focus groups: Theory and practice
- 10.2307/584463 · doi:10.2307/584463
- 10.4135/9781483349008.n8 · DOI
Cited by
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.
Kitzinger, J. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 · Cited by 6,939
Hughes, D., Rodriguez, J., Smith, E. P., Johnson, D. J., Stevenson, H. C., & Spicer, P. (2006) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747 · Cited by 2,420
Self-citationMorgan, D. L. (1996) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 · Cited by 2,353
Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy
McLafferty, I. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03186.x · Cited by 798
What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies
Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-26 · Cited by 670
“There is an extensive literature, ranging from academic classics in grounded theory to pragmatic “how to do” books, that teaches novices how focus groups are usually conducted and indicates how to organise focus groups and how to analyse the data, often within a restricted budget and time span [2,4-6,12-17].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, D., & DuMont, K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 775-806
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W2048999043
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00942247
- The paper
- Hughes, D., & DuMont, K. (1993). Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. American Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00942247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.