Cited by 42Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Memory for unique personal events: Effects of pleasantness

Thompson, Charles P.·1985·Motivation and Emotion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00991832

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thompson found no effect of valence on forgetting rates of personal events, but a strong effect of emotional intensity.

    “Thompson (1985) found no effect of valence on forgetting rates of personal events, but a strong effect of emotional intensity.”

    From Emotional Intensity Predicts Autobiographical Memory Experience (2004) · cites this paper as Thompson, 1985

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, C. P.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Charles P.
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
1985-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
277-289
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W2084098701
Cited by
42
References
13
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, emotional memory, affect intensity, predictability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review