The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
College students' views of male and female college teachers: Part II?Evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Marsh, H. W. (1987) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2 · Cited by 1,333
Cited by
What's in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4 · Cited by 762
Beauty in the classroom: instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity
Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. (2005) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013 · Cited by 391
Marsh, H. W. (2007) · The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_9 · Cited by 367
On students’ (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness.
Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldman, K. A.
- Venue
- Research in Higher Education
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-211
- ISSN
- 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-188X
- OpenAlex
- W2039325221
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
