Cited by 84Philosophy and History of ScienceQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Die Quantenmechanik und die Grundprobleme der Biologie und Psychologie

Jordan, P.·1932·Die Naturwissenschaften

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01494844

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jordan's 1932 article in Die Naturwissenschaften is arguably the first scientific paper on quantum biology.

    “Their ideas culminated in what is arguably the first scientific paper on quantum biology. It was written by Jordan in 1932 and appeared in the German journal Die Naturwissenschaften; the article was entitled ‘Die Quantenmechanik und die Grundprobleme der Biologie und Psychologie’ (‘Quantum mechanics and the fundamental problems of biology and psychology’) [25].”

    From The origins of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Jordan argued that the few molecules controlling living cells within the Steuerungszentrum have a dictatorial influence, such that quantum-level events governing their motion are amplified to influence the entire organism.

    “Jordan similarly argued that the few molecules that control the dynamics of living cells within the ‘Steuerungszentrum’ have a dictatorial influence, such that quantum-level events that govern their motion, such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, are amplified to influence the entire organism.”

    From The origins of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Jordan claimed that the concept of a single dictatorial leader (Führer) was a central principle of life.

    “He even claimed that the concept of a single dictatorial leader (Führer), or guide, was a central principle of life:”

    From The origins of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Jordan claimed that life's missing laws were the rules of chance and probability (indeterminism) of the quantum world scaled up inside living organisms, and called this his amplifier theory.

    “Jordan incorporated the organicism approach into his thinking by claiming that life's missing laws were the rules of chance and probability (the indeterminism) of the quantum world that were somehow scaled up inside living organisms. He called this his ‘amplifier theory’”

    From The origins of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Jordan believed that living organisms were uniquely able to carry out amplification of quantum indeterminism into the macroscopic world, unlike inanimate matter.

    “Jordan believed that living organisms were uniquely able to carry out this amplification in a way that was conspicuously different from inanimate matter, such as a Geiger counter.”

    From The origins of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jordan, P.
Corresponding author
Jordan, P.
Venue
Die Naturwissenschaften
Published
1932-11
Volume
20
Issue
45
Pages
815-821
ISSN
  • 0028-1042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1904
OpenAlex
W2009359365
Cited by
84
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
151.15
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Die Naturwissenschaften (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
quantum mechanics, philosophy of biology, philosophy of psychology, foundations of biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review