Cited by 59Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Key issues concerning fungistatic versus fungicidal drugs

Graybill, J. R., Burgess, D. S., Hardin, T. C.·1997·European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Are there any fungicidal drugs available today? A critical issue in answering this question is that of definition. The simplest, most stringent definitions identify fungistatic drugs as those that inhibit growth, whereas fungicidal drugs kill fungal pathogens. The immunocompetent host is usually far better equipped to eliminate fungal pathogens than the immunosuppressed host. Therefore, it would be especially desirable to have a truly fungicidal drug, one that absolutely kills and fungi, as a treatment option for the immunosuppressed patient. The critical question would be whether a fungicidal drug can be delivered to the target site in a concentration high enough for a sufficient time to reduce the intralesional fungal counts to zero. By this simple definition, there are no fungicidal drugs available today. However, an accepted alternative definition is that often used by the bacteriologist: Fungicidal drugs are those that lead to a reduction of 99.9% of the initial inocula. Although this less restrictive in vitro standard is more easily met, it has serious limitations. Whether the 99.9% kill should be an acceptable standard remains uncertain. As an alternative, the minimum inhibitory concentration, though indicating static activity, has served well; perhaps it should be the only information reported for fungal susceptibility testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01575120

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graybill, J. R., Burgess, D. S., & Hardin, T. C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
1997-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
42-50
ISSN
  • 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-4373
OpenAlex
W2081257374
Cited by
59
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
antifungal agents, immunocompromised patients, minimum inhibitory concentration
MeSH terms
Adjuvants, Immunologic, Antifungal Agents, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycoses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review