Cited by 22Ethics and Social Impacts of AIInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Pathologies of AI: Responsible use of artificial intelligence in professional work

Open access
Stamper, Ronald·1988·AI & Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01891439

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stamper, R.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Stamper, Ronald
Venue
AI & Society
Published
1988-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
3-16
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W1978555888
Cited by
22
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
AI ethics, responsible AI use, expert systems, knowledge representation formalisms, perspicuity, knowledge as commodity, collaborative work support, social problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review