The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Symptoms in chronic constipation
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate whether detailed symptom analysis would help to identify pathophysiologic subgroups in chronic constipation. METHODS: In 190 patients with chronic constipation (age, 53 (range, 18-88) years; 85 percent of whom were women), symptom evaluation, transit time measurement (radiopaque markers), and functional rectoanal evaluation (proctoscopy, anorectal manometry, defecography) were performed. Patients were classified on the basis of objective data from all tests in four different groups ("disordered defecation," "slow gastrointestinal transit," "disordered defecation combined with slow-transit stool," and "no pathologic finding"). RESULTS: In 59 percent of patients, disordered defecation was found, and 27 percent had slow-transit stool. In 6 percent of patients, a combination of both was found; in only 8 percent of patients, there were no pathologic findings. Straining was reported by the vast majority in all groups (82-94 percent). Infrequent bowel movements and abdominal bloating were more common in slow-transit stool (87 and 82 percent vs. 69 and 55 percent, respectively; both P < 0.01). Feeling of incomplete evacuation was more common in disordered defecation (84 vs. 46 percent; P < 0.0001). However, specificity of these symptoms was discouraging (for slow-transit stool: infrequent bowel movements had a sensitivity of 87 percent and a specificity of 32 percent and abdominal bloating had a sensitivity of 82 percent and specificity of 45 percent; for disordered defecation: feeling of incomplete evacuation had a sensitivity of 84 percent and a specificity of 54 percent). Only the sense of obstruction and digital maneuvers were acceptably specific (79 and 85 percent, respectively) for disordered defecation, but sensitivity was low. CONCLUSIONS: Definition of chronic constipation by infrequent bowel movements alone is of little value; the symptom "necessity to strain" is much better suited (94 percent sensitivity). Specificity of infrequent bowel movements for slow-transit stool was discouraging. Sense of obstruction and digital manipulation for evacuation are relatively specific for disordered defecation but insensitive. Therefore, symptoms of chronically constipated patients are not well suited to differentiate between the pathophysiologic subgroups suffering chronic constipation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Symptom complaints and health care seeking behavior in subjects with bowel dysfunction
Sandler, R. S., Drossman, D. A., Nathan, H. P., & McKee, D. C. (1984) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(84)90706-6 · Cited by 326
Cited by
American Gastroenterological Association Technical Review on Constipation
Bharucha, A. E., Pemberton, J. H., & Locke, G. R. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.028 · Cited by 909
Lembo, A., & Camilleri, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra020995 · Cited by 692
Psychometric Validation of a Constipation Symptom Assessment Questionnaire
L. Frank, L. K. (1999) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/003655299750025327 · Cited by 458
Rao, S. S. C., Seaton, K., Miller, M., Brown, K., Nygaard, I., Stumbo, P., Zimmerman, B., & Schulze, K. (2007) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.023 · Cited by 388
Clinical Utility of Diagnostic Tests for Constipation in Adults: A Systematic Review
Rao, S. S. C., Ozturk, R., & Laine, L. (2005) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41845.x · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, A., Voderholzer, W. A., Klauser, A. G., & Müller-Lissner, S.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 902-906
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065735588
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.