The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Utility of Diagnostic Tests for Constipation in Adults: A Systematic Review
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because symptoms alone do not identify pathophysiology or differentiate subgroups of constipation, diagnostic tests are generally recommended. However, their utility is not known. We performed a systematic review of diagnostic tests commonly used in constipation. METHODS: We searched the English literature using MEDLINE and PUBMED databases from 1966 to 2004 for studies in adults published as full manuscripts whose methodological quality was above a minimum score. RESULTS: No studies assessed the routine use of blood tests or abdominal x-ray. One retrospective endoscopic study showed that cancer and polyp detection rate was comparable to historical controls. Two studies of barium enema were unhelpful in diagnosis of constipation. Physiological studies showed differences in study population, methodology, and interpretation, and there was no gold standard. Ten colonic transit studies showed prevalence of 38-80% in support of slow transit constipation. Nine anorectal manometry studies showed prevalence of 20-75% for detecting dyssynergia. Nine studies of balloon expulsion showed impaired expulsion of 23-67%. Among 10 defecography studies, abnormalities were reported in 25-90% and dyssynergia in 13-37%. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence to support the use of blood tests, radiography, or endoscopy in the routine work up of patients with constipation without alarm features is lacking. Colonic transit, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion tests reveal physiologic abnormalities in many selected patients with constipation, but no single test adequately defines pathophysiology. Large, well-designed, prospective studies are required to examine the utility of these tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain
Thompson, W. G., Longstreth, G. F., Drossman, D. A., Heaton, K. W., Irvine, E. J., & Müller-Lissner, S. A. (1999) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.45.2008.ii43 · Cited by 2,440
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
Lijmer, J. G. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1061 · Cited by 1,861
Rex, D. K., Bond, J. H., Winawer, S. J., Levin, T. R., Burt, R. W., Johnson, D. A., Kirk, L. M., Litlin, S., Lieberman, D. A., Waye, J. D., et al. (2002) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(02)04168-0 · Cited by 1,049
Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit
Metcalf, A. M., Phillips, S. F., Zinsmeister, A. R., MacCarty, R. L., Beart, R. W., & Wolff, B. G. (1987) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(87)90837-7 · Cited by 928 · cited 2×
“This includes the single capsule technique (64) and the multiple capsules or multiple x-ray technique (30, 1, 35, 39).”
MethodLembo, A., & Camilleri, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra020995 · Cited by 692
AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques
Diamant, N. E., Kamm, M. A., Wald, A., & Whitehead, W. E. (1999) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70195-2 · Cited by 461
Risk Factors for Advanced Colonic Neoplasia and Hyperplastic Polyps in Asymptomatic Individuals
Lieberman, D. A. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.22.2959 · Cited by 450
Anismus in chronic constipation
Preston, D. M., & Lennard-Jones, J. E. (1985) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01318172 · Cited by 438
Severe chronic constipation of young women: 'idiopathic slow transit constipation'.
Preston, D. M., & Lennard-Jones, J. E. (1986) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.27.1.41 · Cited by 403
Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination
Rao, S. (1998) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(98)00207-x · Cited by 364
Self-citation
Cited by
(2009) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03951.x · Cited by 444
Rao, S. S. C., Seaton, K., Miller, M., Brown, K., Nygaard, I., Stumbo, P., Zimmerman, B., & Schulze, K. (2007) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.023 · Cited by 388
Self-citationDiagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults
Rao, S. S. C., Rattanakovit, K., & Patcharatrakul, T. (2016) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.53 · Cited by 337
Self-citationChronic Constipation in the Elderly
Bouras, E. P., & Tangalos, E. G. (2009) · Gastroenterology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2009.06.001 · Cited by 275
Serra, J., Pohl, D., Azpiroz, F., Chiarioni, G., Ducrotté, P., Gourcerol, G., Hungin, A. P. S., Layer, P., Mendive, J., Pfeifer, J., et al. (2020) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.13762 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, S. S. C., Ozturk, R., & Laine, L.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1605-1615
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2019556071
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Utility of Diagnostic Tests for Constipation in Adults: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41845.x
- The paper
- Rao, S. S. C., Ozturk, R., & Laine, L. (2005). Clinical Utility of Diagnostic Tests for Constipation in Adults: A Systematic Review. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41845.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
