The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Postoperative adhesions: Ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery
Abstract
PURPOSE: Postoperative adhesions are a significant problem after colorectal surgery. However, the basic epidemiology and clinical burden are unknown. The Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study has investigated the scale of the problem in a population of 5 million. METHODS: Validated data from the Scottish National Health Service Medical Record Linkage Database were used to define a cohort of 12,584 patients undergoing open lower abdominal surgery in 1986. Readmissions for potential adhesion-related disease in the subsequent ten years were analyzed. The methodology was conservative in interpreting adhesion-related disease. RESULTS: In the study cohort 32.6 percent of patients were readmitted a mean of 2.2 times in the subsequent ten years for a potential adhesion-related problem. Although 25.4 percent of readmissions were in the first postoperative year, they continued steadily throughout the study period. After open lower abdominal surgery 7.3 percent (643) of readmissions (8,861) were directly related to adhesions. This varied according to operation site: colon (7.1 percent), rectum (8.8 percent), and small intestine (7.6 percent). The readmission rate was assessed to provide an indicator of relative risk of adhesion-related problems after initial surgery. The overall average rate of readmissions was 70.4 per 100 initial operations, with 5.1 directly related to adhesions. This rose to 116.4 and 116.5, respectively, after colonic or rectal surgery-with 8.2 and 10.3 directly related to adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high relative risk of adhesion-related problems after open lower abdominal surgery and a correspondingly high workload associated with these readmissions. This is influenced by the initial site of surgery, colon and rectum having both the greatest impact on workload and highest relative risk of directly adhesion-related problems. The study provides sound justification for improved adhesion prevention strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
ten Broek, R. P. G., Issa, Y., van Santbrink, E. J. P., Bouvy, N. D., Kruitwagen, R. F. P. M., Jeekel, J., Bakkum, E. A., Rovers, M. M., & van Goor, H. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f5588 · Cited by 686
Rami Reddy, S. R., & Cappell, M. S. (2017) · Current Gastroenterology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11894-017-0566-9 · Cited by 294
Further Evidence of the Anti‐inflammatory Effects of Silver Nanoparticles
Wong, K. K. Y., Cheung, S. O. F., Huang, L., Niu, J., Tao, C., Ho, C., Che, C., & Tam, P. K. H. (2009) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200900049 · Cited by 269
Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature
Schnüriger, B., Barmparas, G., Branco, B. C., Lustenberger, T., Inaba, K., & Demetriades, D. (2011) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.02.008 · Cited by 254
Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies
Fatehi Hassanabad, A., Zarzycki, A. N., Jeon, K., Dundas, J. A., Vasanthan, V., Deniset, J. F., & Fedak, P. W. M. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11071027 · Cited by 178
Role of the peritoneal cavity in the prevention of postoperative adhesions, pain, and fatigue
Koninckx, P. R., Gomel, V., Ussia, A., & Adamyan, L. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.012 · Cited by 139
Yang, B., Gong, C., Qian, Z., Zhao, X., Li, Z., Qi, X., Zhou, S., Zhong, Q., Luo, F., & Wei, Y. (2010) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/1472-6750-10-65 · Cited by 40
Therapeutic Roles of Statins in Gynecology and Obstetrics: The Current Evidence
Zeybek, B., Costantine, M., Kilic, G. S., & Borahay, M. A. (2018) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719117750751 · Cited by 31
Wiseman, D. M., Meidler, R., Lyahovetsky, Y., Kurman, E., Horn, S., & Nur, I. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.026 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, M. C., Ellis, H., Moran, B. J., Thompson, J. N., Wilson, M. S., Menzies, D., McGuire, A., Lower, A. M., Hawthorn, R. J. S., O'Brien, F., Buchan, S., & Crowe, A. M.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 822-829
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989079858
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.