Cited by 130Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons’ source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue

Kammerer, Yvonne, Bråten, Ivar, Gerjets, Peter, Strømsø, Helge I.·2013·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.012

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P., & Strømsø, H. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Kammerer, Yvonne
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
1193-1203
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009754219
Cited by
129
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
epistemological beliefs, source evaluation, web search, health information seeking, source credibility, eye tracking, university students, health information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review