Cited by 85Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Affiliative and submissive communication in rhesus macaques

Maestripieri, Dario, Wallen, Kim·1997·Primates

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02382003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maestripieri, D., & Wallen, K.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Primates
Published
1997-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
127-138
ISSN
  • 0032-8332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-7365
OpenAlex
W2089759670
Cited by
85
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Primates (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
rhesus monkeys, facial expressions, gesture, dominance rank, sex differences, aggression, breeding season, mother-infant interaction, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review