Cited by 43Face Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Effect of distracting faces on visual selective attention in the monkey

Open access
Landman, Rogier, Sharma, Jitendra, Sur, Mriganka, Desimone, Robert·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In primates, visual stimuli with social and emotional content tend to attract attention. Attention might be captured through rapid, automatic, subcortical processing or guided by slower, more voluntary cortical processing. Here we examined whether irrelevant faces with varied emotional expressions interfere with a covert attention task in macaque monkeys. In the task, the monkeys monitored a target grating in the periphery for a subtle color change while ignoring distracters that included faces appearing elsewhere on the screen. The onset time of distracter faces before the target change, as well as their spatial proximity to the target, was varied from trial to trial. The presence of faces, especially faces with emotional expressions interfered with the task, indicating a competition for attentional resources between the task and the face stimuli. However, this interference was significant only when faces were presented for greater than 200 ms. Emotional faces also affected saccade velocity and reduced pupillary reflex. Our results indicate that the attraction of attention by emotional faces in the monkey takes a considerable amount of processing time, possibly involving cortical-subcortical interactions. Intranasal application of the hormone oxytocin ameliorated the interfering effects of faces. Together these results provide evidence for slow modulation of attention by emotional distracters, which likely involves oxytocinergic brain circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1420167111

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intranasal administration of 24 IU OT modulates social behavior in nonhuman primates.

    “This dose, administered intranasally, has been shown in nonhuman primates to increase OT levels in cerebrospinal fluid significantly (54) and to modulate social behavior (65), as well as to affect brain activity (66) and phasic activity of the parasympathetic nervous system (67) in humans.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landman, R., Sharma, J., Sur, M., & Desimone, R.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
111
Issue
50
Pages
18037-18042
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2024068621
Cited by
43
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (EY017292)
  • Simons Foundation (SF) (none)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
visual selective attention, emotional face processing, attentional capture, distractor interference, covert attention, macaque, saccade velocity, pupillary reflex, oxytocin, attentional modulation, social attention, spatial proximity
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Attention, Emotions, Eye Movements, Face, Facial Expression, Macaca mulatta, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review