Cited by 46Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Coder training: theoretical training or practical socialization?

Open access
Hak, Tony, Bernts, Ton·1996·Qualitative Sociology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02393420

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hak, T., & Bernts, T.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bernts, Ton
Venue
Qualitative Sociology
Published
1996-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
235-257
ISSN
  • 0162-0436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7837
OpenAlex
W2026993398
Cited by
46
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
coder training, intercoder reliability, open-ended questions, coding instructions, socialization, qualitative data analysis, coding validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review