Cited by 916Student Assessment and FeedbackProblem and Project Based LearningVocational Education and Training

A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment

Open access
Gulikers, Judith T. M., Bastiaens, Theo J., Kirschner, Paul A.·2004·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02504676

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assessment authenticity is strengthened by requiring students to demonstrate practical skills in laboratory scenarios mirroring professional practice, while direct observation provides higher validity by evaluating actual competencies rather than written communication abilities.

    “Assessment authenticity is strengthened by requiring students to demonstrate practical skills in laboratory scenarios mirroring professional practice, while direct observation provides higher validity by evaluating actual competencies rather than written communication abilities [15–17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Corresponding author
Gulikers, Judith T. M.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2004-09
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
67-86
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2061430993
Cited by
916
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 28
FWCI
41.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational Education and Training
Keywords
authentic assessment, assessment design, authenticity of assessment, nursing education, vocational colleges, student perceptions, teacher perceptions, professional practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review