Cited by 128Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Psychiatric disorders and medical care utilization among people in the general population who report fatigue

Walker, Edward A., Katon, Wayne J., Jemelka, Ron P.·1993·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objective To study the prevalence of fatigue in the general population and its association with psychiatric disorders, somatization, and medical utilization. Setting The public-use data tape from the 1984 National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study. Participants Household sample of 18,571 subjects. Interventions Structured psychiatric interviews were reviewed to study the prevalence of complaints of current and lifetime fatigue and their relationship to selected psychiatric disorders. Results Fatigue has high current (6.7%) and lifetime (24.4%) prevalences in the general population. Medically unexplained fatigue also has high current (6.0%) and lifetime (15.5%) prevalences. When compared with those reporting no current fatigue, subjects who reported current (one-month) fatigue were significantly more likely to have experienced current and lifetime episodes of major depression, dysthymic disorder, panic disorder, and somatization disorder. They also had significantly higher mean numbers of lifetime and current DSM-III psychiatric diagnoses, medically unexplained physical symptoms (not just fatigue-related symptoms), and visits to health care providers than did patients without current episodes of fatigue. Conclusions The high prevalence of fatigue in the general population appears to be significantly associated with increased lifetime and current risk for affective, anxiety, and somatoform disorders, as well as increased utilization of medical services. These data suggest that assessment of both medical and psychological health may be essential for the proper care of patients with fatigue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02599621

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, E. A., Katon, W. J., & Jemelka, R. P.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
1993-08
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
436-440
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W1984083575
Cited by
128
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
fatigue, mental illness, somatization, health care utilization, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, panic disorder, somatoform disorders, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, prevalence, medical visits, psychiatric comorbidity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Fatigue, Female, Health Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Somatoform Disorders, United States, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Prevalence, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review