Marital infidelity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among American couples, adultery prevalence estimates range from at least one fifth of husbands and one tenth of wives to as high as 72% of husbands and 54% of wives, depending on the survey.
“Given this unharmonious set of factors, it can hardly come as a surprise that at least one fifth of husbands and at least one tenth of wives commit adultery. These numbers—for American couples—range as high as 72 and 54 % respectively, depending on the survey (see Greeley 1994; Allen et al. 2005).”
From Natural Selection, Childrearing, and the Ethics of Marriage (and Divorce): Building a Case for the Neuroenhancement of Human Relationships (2012) · cites this paper as Greeley 1994
Ease of long distance travel and the ballooning size of social groups increase opportunities for comparatively low-risk love affairs.
“Ease of long distance travel and the ballooning size of social groups increase opportunities for such (comparatively) low-risk love affairs (Greeley 1994).”
From Natural Selection, Childrearing, and the Ethics of Marriage (and Divorce): Building a Case for the Neuroenhancement of Human Relationships (2012) · cites this paper as Greeley 1994
Natural selection did not shape basic mating strategies nor underlying brain chemistry to foster life-long, monogamous matrimony in the modern world, but rather to promote reproductive success of progenitors in the Pleistocene.
“Natural selection did not shape our basic mating strategies—nor our underlying brain chemistry—to foster life-long, monogamous matrimony in the modern world, but rather to promote the reproductive success of our progenitors in the environment of the Pleistocene [2, 3].”
From Could intranasal oxytocin be used to enhance relationships? Research imperatives, clinical policy, and ethical considerations (2013) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Power Increases Infidelity Among Men and Women
Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611416252 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Allen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpi014 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample.
Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.735 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
The aftershocks of infidelity: a review of infidelity-based attachment trauma
Warach, B., & Josephs, L. (2021) · Sexual and Relationship Therapy · doi:10.1080/14681994.2019.1577961 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Why do men marry and why do they stray?
Winking, J., Kaplan, H., Gurven, M., & Rucas, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0437 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Earp, B. D., Sandberg, A., & Savulescu, J. (2012) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-012-0081-8 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Wudarczyk, O. A., Earp, B. D., Guastella, A., & Savulescu, J. (2013) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e3283642e10 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Greeley, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greeley, Andrew
- Venue
- Society
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 9-13
- ISSN
- 0041-1035 (ISSN-L)
- 0147-2011
- 1936-4725
- OpenAlex
- W4236547071
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- adultery, marriage, sexual infidelity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review