The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women’s suffrage in the measurement of democracy: Problems of operationalization
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0009 · Cited by 2,132
Modernization: Theories and Facts
Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0004 · Cited by 1,983
Hewitt, C. (1977) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094750 · Cited by 216
Cited by
A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007
Boix, C., Miller, M., & Rosato, S. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012463905 · Cited by 1,072
Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Buhaug, H. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139084161 · Cited by 978
Democratization and Research Methods
Coppedge, M. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139016179 · Cited by 303
Invigorating Democracy in Turkey: The Agency of Organized Islamist Women
Aksoy, H. A. (2015) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x1500001x · Cited by 85
Multiple Measurements, Elusive Agreement, and Unstable Outcomes in the Study of Regime Change
Lueders, H., & Lust, E. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3042470 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Paxton, P.
- Venue
- Studies in Comparative International Development
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 92-111
- ISSN
- 0039-3606 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6167
- OpenAlex
- W1965437934
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women’s suffrage in the measurement of democracy: Problems of operationalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02699767
- The paper
- Paxton, P. (2000). Women’s suffrage in the measurement of democracy: Problems of operationalization. Studies in Comparative International Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02699767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.